365 Days:
Literal Harmony and Astronomical Events 

This is n internet argument on the frequency of the word  YaWM (Day) in the Quran. In the end of this lengthy argument, Daniel Lomax admitted that the frequency of the word YaWM (day) in singular form is indeed 365, its plural form is 30, and the total of all its derivatives is 475 (19×25). This is one of the rare arguments that both parties finally reach to the same conclusion.

 Edip Yuksel vs. Daniel Lomax, at al

(The discussion took place in January-February 1996
at as soc.religion.islam group under
“365 days” hoax exposed)

In 1959, Abdurrazzaq Nawfal, an Egyptian scholar, noticed some mathematical relations between the frequency of certain words. While writing his book “Al-Islamu Deenun wa Dunya” (Islam: both Religion and World), he noticed that the frequency of the word “Dunya” (World) had exactly the same frequency as the word “Akhirah” (Hereafter), 115 times each, in the Quran. In 1968, while writing another book titled “Alemul Jinni wal Malayika” (Universe of Jinns and Angels), he noticed that the word “Shaytan” (Satan) had exactly the same frequency as the word “Malak” (Angel), 88 times each. These interesting literary symmetry in the frequency of certain words led him to make a more comprehensive study on the numerical structure of the Quran. Nawfal published his findings in 1983 in a book: “Al-I’cazul Adadiy LilQuranil Kareem” (Numerical Miracle Of the Holy Quran). The book was published by Darul Kitabil Arabiy, Beirut, Lebanon.

Some of his findings are striking. Three examples, I believe, leaves no doubt that the Quran is a mathematically designed unique book.

• The word “month” (shahr) occurs 12 times.
• The word “days” (ayyam,yawmayn) occurs 30 times.
• The word “day” (yawm) occurs 365 times.

When Ahmed ELNEWEIHI posted a brief article on SRI (Socio.Religion.Islam) informing the readers the frequency of these three words in the Quran, all the followers of medieval Arab fabrications (Hadith and Sunna) rushed to reject the claims. The ignorance and backwardness of the followers of Hadith and Sunna, unfortunately is reinforced by their arrogance. They can never see the miracle of the Quran. They only parrot their scholar’s empty rhetoric that the Quran is a literary miracle without questioning its meaning and implications. They reduce the author of the Quran to the level of their simple-minded scholars. “How could God’s word have a mathematical pattern in it? Mathematics? No way!” they exclaim. Then, they try all the tricks and deception to reject the obvious mathematical patterns exist in the Quran.

If you are interested with the arguments on the mathematical structure of the Quran, please obtain my lengthy debate with Lomax, in “Running Like Zebras”. The argument exposes the hypocrisy and deception of those who have traded God’s word with medieval Arab fabrications, that is, Hadith and Sunnah. You can download the book from http://www.moslem.org/yuksel.htm. [Now, you can download the book from tihs site]

In the end of this argument we will present the list of chapters and verses where these three words occur in the Quran.

Ahmed ELNEWEIHI:The word “YAWM”, or “day” is mentioned 365 times in the quraan.

DEAN Ahmad: But there are 354 days in the Muslim year.

ELNEWEIHI: But, who said the Quran is restricted to the muslim calender? The Quran is a message to all mankind and should reflect the more “accurate” count of the number of days in the year.

Daniel LOMAX: Then should we expect there to be 365.2425 occurrences of the word “day” in the Qur’an? By the way, has anyone verified the count? This figure comes from the Khalifites, who are notorious for doctored counts. Many of them do not check out.

Jochen KATZ: Well, shouldn’t you expect more accuracy from the word of God, if it was indeed a thing planned by him to discover? It is more like 365.3 days. So, only a crude first approximation. And then, scientific research has shown that the earth is slowing down in its rotation. Comparison of some shells and the growth rings of very old trees that have been found, show that several thousand years ago the year had nearly 400 days. And we are loosing a number of seconds every year. So, the time will come it won’t only have 364 days and each day a bit longer than today. That too will make the miracle disappear. Just wait long enough.

ELNEWEIHI: If you have a word that makes sense and can be described as 0.3…. of a word, please let me know.

This is not a “crude” approximation, this is a mathematically correct approximation. I thought from your e-mail address that you may have some mathematical background, but may be I am wrong. For your information, 365 is the proper mathematical rounding up of the number 365.3…….

Having been so accurate as to request that the Quran should have repeated the word “Day” 365.3…. times (and even then, I am sure you would not have been convinced), I do not expect that you turn around and tell me that your reasons for believing in Jesus is that he was foretold in the Bible. I will then ask you to find from the bible a quote that describes all the details (including the height, the color, the era, the name of the king of the day, . so on..) that would show beyond any doubt that your beliefs are on sound basis. After all, the Bible should have made it so clear that no one would have any doubt that he was the Son of God.

Edip YUKSEL: Katz is demonstrating a sophisticated degree of knowledge! Ironically, he flunks to see the clear and simple relation between the frequency of the word “yawm” (day) in the Quran, and the number of days in a year, that is 365. I wonder why he is resorting to fractions of a day to deny such a clear message. How hard he is trying to reject the clear mathematical relation! Watching the Muhammedan and Christian disbelievers rejecting the clear divine signs confirms the Quranic statement once more (6:25; 7:146).

As for the slowing down… Well, the number of days won’t go down 364 since the end of the world is not too far (42:17 ….). Quran gives the time of the “Hour” and it is less than a thousand year. The Hour will struck disbelievers. Just wait long enough.

KATZ: By the way, some Christians employ the same silly reasoning to the Bible too. You are welcome to answer in the same revealing way.

ELNEWEIHI: I will not turn down your invitation. I agree you with you that some christians employ silly reasoning to the bible, but I do not agree that it is the “same” silly reasoning. For the numberof days in a year is 365 is not silly, but how some christians quote from the bible to show that the bible had predicted the future is indeed silly. I heard and read some of them say the bible had predicted many events and wars when it said that people of the North will conquer people of the South and so on.

KATZ: Counting exercises keep many a believer busy. But I don’t think they will ever establish anything of great significance. Just my personal opinion.

ELNEWEIHI: If you remember, I said to you in my first article that we can go on with these and similar discusions without producing any evidence that can be called “an evidence beyond any doubt”. I invited you to debate with me the basis I cited before (and can cite again) for my belief and those that you can site for your belief. You have unfortunately declined.

Your answer reminded me of the verse in the Quran where God says to Muhammed that even if He (God) sent down a ladder from the sky so that Muhammed can climb on it in front of the non-believer (as a proof of being a prophet of God) , they will only say: you musthave hypnotized us to see you doing this, but it was not actually true.

KATZ: just head [sic] read this ‘slowing down thing’ a few days ago, so that was a new thought, but I had better adorned it with many smileys as to not be taken so seriously in this specific posting.

ELNEWEIHI: It is too bad you are retracting that statement, because it just occured to me that if the “slowing down thing” was correct, it would have pointed to yet, another miracle in the Qur’an.

Since the counting of the word “Yawm” or “day” and relating it to the number of days in a year was “discovered” only recently, one can say that the Qur’an has prophesized that when people will discover this count, the number of days in the time of this discovery will indeed be rounded to 365 days. In other words, we would have here the combination of a scientific fact and a prophecy in one.

Would not that have been a more accurate prophecy than the statements in the bible that christians claim them to be prophecies, to try to prove that the bible is truly the word of God?

I must add here that until I verify the count of the word “Yawm” in the Qur’an myself, I can not claim any miracle. I must also repeat that I am not in a hurry to do that, because this is not the basis of my belief.

KATZ: For that I want to combine Mr. Lomax counting results with Ahmed Elneweihi’s ingenious prophetic interpretation. 🙂

Now, may I propose that this is a backward prophecy instead of a forward prophecy? And the scientific method (proof?) given by the Qur’an (or better: by those who have nothing better to do to make up proofs for ) (the divine origin of it by methods which were never intended to be read into ) (the text) for the real age of the earth is that we calculate back how many years from the creation of the earth it would have taken to slow down the rotation of the earth as to give the decrease from 475 days/year to 365 days/year, because clearly, this given number corresponds to the time of creation.

Only humorous responses to this posting will be taken seriously.

Asser HASSANAIN:You know, I don’t understand what these arguments about the numeracity of the Quran is all about! The numeracity of the Quran (that is, the striking numerical pattern) should NOT be used as means to support an unrelated religious view or a religious discussion.

LOMAX: I admire the brother for admitting his ignorance at the outset. What striking pattern? Aside from the utter lack of such a “pattern,” I agree with the remainder. Whatever pattern exists, even if it is very, very striking, does not ipso facto prove much other than there is a pattern. When I did believe that there was a clear pattern, it did not lead me to conclude that Rashad Khalifa was a Messenger!, only that the book was beyond ordinary human origin. But I was depending on false data from Khalifa.

Nevertheless, I remain grateful to him, for this false data increased my faith and led me to begin to seriously read the Qur’an in Arabic, where I found ample confirmation not dependent upon number tricks.

LOMAX: Brother Behnam has noted the lack of independent confirmation of Khalifa’s work. This is a little misleading. Many others have reported on numerical phenomena in the Qur’an; however, there is no coherent explanation of what it is nor any demonstration that what has been discovered is statistically significant. “Beyond Probability” by Arik does attempt a calculation of probability, but it is incorrect on its face, as will be seen by anyone who knows probability theory. It does not take an expert, by the way, just a basic knowledge.

Further, Khalifa’s work is so full of errors and undocumented methods that anyone who tries to verify it soon runs into serious difficulties. This is not obvious to English speakers, because our language is written very differently than Arabic. For example, Khalifa counts the letter alif, but there is, in fact, no consensus on how to write alif in the Qur’an, and Khalifa’s counts correspond to no known ms. or system of writing. Certainly they do not correspond to the Tashkent mushaf, which Khalifa used when counting Sad (in one place; it is not clear that he used it consistently, in fact, it is clear that he did not.)

Some time back, I wrote a “Draft FAQ” on this subject, detailing matters on which clarity is necessary before claims about these miracles can be objectively verified. Yuksel promised to respond to that, but so far, nothing but more bluster. I think I will repost that FAQ.

LOMAX: It is the wont [sic] of Khalifites to claim this or that numerical phenomenon in the Qur’an as a “miracle.” In spite of repeated invitations, they have never defined just what they mean by “miracle,” but the apparent meaning is any striking congruity of numbers derived from the Qur’an, or sometimes from other sources like the numerical values of the letters in Rashad Khalifa’s name.

When word counts are involved, more often than not, I have found that the counts have been manipulated to produce the striking totals. This claim that the occurrence of the word “day” (yawm) in the Qur’an is 365 is a very good example.

Edip Yuksel wrote: “Below is the frequency of the word “Yawm” day (in its singular form) in the Quran. I have copied from one of my Turkish books. Unfortunately, during the transfer it lost its format.”

Notice that Yuksel did qualify the statement, unlike the earlier mentions of this “miracle” in this newsgroup. He is only counting singular forms. Now, if it were necessary to count the dual and plural forms of the word to come up with the “miraculous” total, I am certain that they would have been included. Nevertheless, it would be interesting if all occurrences of the singular “day” in the Qur’an totalled 365. Do they?

I have seen this claim before. Then, I looked up “yawm” in the Kassis concordance, and found 475 mentions. However, this included the dual and plural forms, and it is a piece of work to separate them out. But now Yuksel has presented us with a list, albeit mangled, of his claimed “singular forms.” Further, I just obtained a copy of the Flugel concordance, which lists each unique form in superb detail. So, I was moved to check this claim out more precisely.

I took Yuksel’s list, formatted it, and imported it into a database program. Then I used the Kassis concordance to insert all mentions of the word, including the dual and plural. Since Kassis, conveniently, gives the verse numbers from Flugel’s edition of the Qur’an in addition to the more standard numbers used by Khalifa, I was able to easily identify each form. In the process, I found several misprints in Yuksel’s list, plus tabulation errors, as well as three occurrences missing from Flugel. I did not find any errors in Kassis. Note, however, that I do not have a validated Arabic Qur’an in machine-readable form. It is possible, but unlikely, that there are additional mentions not listed here.

The finished database is appended below for anyone who wishes to examine the data.

Of the 475 total occurrences of all forms of “yawm,” 3 are in the dual and 27 are in the plural, leaving 445 in the singular.

Flugel’s concordance lists 34 different forms of this word, including variations caused by prefixes or suffixes. Here is a list of these forms, with the total count for each form, and Yuksel’s inferred count. The “<” at the right shows counts which are in error, or which result from an unstated condition. The number at the beginning of each row is the sequence of the form in Flugel. Transliteration notes are at the end of this article.

1. form total/Yuksel
   20 !al-‘ayya!mu 1 0 plural
   16 !alyawma 38 38
   24 !l-‘ayya!mi 1 0 plural
   9 !lyawmi 1 1
   3 !lyawmu 2 2
   26 -‘ayya!ma~! 3 0 plural
   21 -‘ayya!mi 1 0 plural
   23 -‘ayya!mi~ 18 0 plural
   25 -‘yya!ma 1 0 plural
   10 bi!lyawmi 2 2
   22 bi-‘ayya!mi 1 0 plural
   5 biyawmi 5 5
   17 fa!lyawma 8 6 <
   33 fayawma^’i&i~ 4 0 <
   6 liyawmi 4 4
   8 liyawmi~ 4 4
   18 wa!lyawma 2 2
   12 wa!lyawmi 21 21
   27 wa-‘ayya!ma~! 1 0 plural
   11 wabi!lyawmi 1 1
   14 wayawma 44 44
   34 wayawma^’i&i~ 1 0 <
   13 yawma 132 131
   32 yawma^’i&i~ 65 1 <
   15 yawma~! 16 16
   31 yawmahum 4 1 <
   19 yawmayni 3 0 dual
   4 yawmi 31 31
   7 yawmi~ 28 28
   30 yawmihim 2 1 <
   29 yawmikum 4 0 <
   1 yawmu 16 16
   2 yawmu~ 9 9
   28 yawmukum 1 0 <
   TOTALS 475 364

Yuksel’s counts do not add up to 365 because he skipped his number 297. To summarize the discrepancies, besides plurals, Yuksel has not counted any of the forms ending with ^-i&i~, except for one single mention at 45:27. This accounts for 69 omissions. He counted 6 mentions of fa!lyawma out of 8 (2 omissions). He also inconsistently counted simple forms of yawm with suffixed pronouns: 1 out of 4 occurrences of yawmahum were counted (3 omissions), 1 out of 2 yawmihim (1 omissions), and yawmikum and yawmukum were not counted at all (5 omissions). Finally, he missed a mention of yawma at 45:17. With the 30 duals and plurals, this accounts for the difference of 111.

I see no way to reconcile this data with the claim of 365 mentions. The sloppiness of the counting is typical of Khalifite claims; if the count works out, research and checking have a tendency to stop.

I would appreciate notice of any substantive errors in this article…

ALL MENTIONS OF ANY FORM OF “YAWIMA” IN THE QUR’AN

• “yseq” is the number given by Yuksel to the mention, or is his number for the most recent mention.
• “xseq” is the number of additional mentions I found. If “xseq” is 0, the mention is found in Yuksel’s article. These numbers can be used to recover the verse order if the database has been resorted.
• “verse” is the standard verse number, prefixed with “y” if it is from Yuksel, and “x” if it is not in his article.
• “F#” is the verse number from Flugel’s concordance and Qur’an.
• “form” gives my own transliteration of the Arabic form. This is non-standard, but standard transliteration does not fully convey Arabic writing, only pronunciation, more or less. Transliteration notes are at the end.
• “trans” is a rough translation of some words; also some mentions of “day” give a specific number, which is shown.

yseq xseq verse F# form trans notes
1 1 0 y1:4 3 yawmi
2 2 0 y2:8 7 wabi!lyawmi
3 3 0 y2:48 45 yawma~!
4 4 0 y2:62 59 wa!lyawmi
5 4 1 x2:80 74 -‘ayya!ma~! days
6 5 0 y2:85 79 wayawma
7 6 0 y2:113 107 yawma
8 7 0 y2:123 117 yawma~!
9 8 0 y2:126 120 wa!lyawmi
10 9 0 y2:174 169 yawma
11 10 0 y2:177 172 wa!lyawmi
12 10 2 x2:184 180 -‘ayya!ma~! days
13 10 3 x2:184 180 -‘ayya!mi~ days
14 10 4 x2:185 181 -‘ayya!mi~ days
15 10 5 x2:196 192 -‘ayya!mi~ 3 days
16 10 6 x2:203 199 -‘ayya!mi~ days
17 10 7 x2:203 199 yawmayni 2 days
18 11 0 y2:212 208 yawma
19 12 0 y2:228 228 wa!lyawmi
20 13 0 y2:232 232 wa!lyawmi
21 14 0 y2:249 250 !alyawma
22 15 0 y2:254 255 yawmu~
23 16 0 y2:259 261 yawma~! Y had 2:255
24 17 0 y2:259 261 yawmi~ part day
25 18 0 y2:264 266 wa!lyawmi
26 19 0 y2:281 281 yawma~!
27 20 0 y3:9 7 liyawmi~
28 20 8 x3:24 23 -‘ayya!ma~! days
29 21 0 y3:25 24 liyawmi~
30 22 0 y3:30 28 yawma
31 22 9 x3:41 36 -‘ayya!mi~ 3 days
32 23 0 y3:55 48 yawmi
33 24 0 y3:77 71 yawma
34 25 0 y3:106 102 yawma
35 26 0 y3:114 110 wa!lyawmi
36 26 10 x3:140 134 !al-‘ayya!mu days
37 27 0 y3:155 149 yawma
38 28 0 y3:161 155 yawma
39 29 0 y3:166 160 yawma
40 29 11 x3:167 160 yawma^’i&i~ that day
41 30 0 y3:180 176 yawma
42 31 0 y3:185 182 yawma
43 32 0 y3:194 192 yawma
44 33 0 y4:38 42 bi!lyawmi
45 34 0 y4:39 43 wa!lyawmi
46 34 12 x4:42 45 yawma^’i&i~ that day
47 35 0 y4:59 62 wa!lyawmi
48 36 0 y4:87 89 yawmi
49 37 0 y4:109 109 yawma
50 38 0 y4:136 135 wa!lyawmi
51 39 0 y4:141 140 yawma
52 40 0 y4:159 157 wayawma
53 41 0 y4:162 160 wa!lyawmi
54 42 0 y5:3 4 !alyawma
55 43 0 y5:3 5 !alyawma
56 44 0 y5:5 7 !alyawma
57 45 0 y5:14 17 yawmi
58 46 0 y5:36 40 yawmi
59 47 0 y5:64 69 yawmi
60 48 0 y5:69 73 wa!lyawmi
61 48 13 x5:89 91 -‘ayya!mi~ 3 days
62 49 0 y5:109 108 yawma
63 50 0 y5:119 119 yawmu
64 51 0 y6:12 12 yawmi
65 52 0 y6:15 15 yawmi~
66 52 14 x6:16 16 yawma^’i&i~ that day
67 53 0 y6:22 22 wayawma
68 54 0 y6:73 72 wayawma
69 55 0 y6:73 73 yawma
70 56 0 y6:93 93 !alyawma
71 57 0 y6:128 128 wayawma
72 57 15 x6:130 130 yawmikum
73 58 0 y6:141 142 yawma
74 59 0 y6:158 159 yawma
75 59 16 x7:8 7 yawma^’i&i~ that day
76 60 0 y7:14 13 yawmi
77 61 0 y7:32 30 yawma
78 61 17 x7:51 49 fa!lyawma today
79 62 0 y7:51 49 yawmihim
80 63 0 y7:53 51 yawma
81 63 18 x7:54 52 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
82 64 0 y7:59 57 yawmi~
83 65 0 y7:163 163 yawma
84 66 0 y7:163 163 wayawma
85 67 0 y7:167 166 yawmi
86 68 0 y7:172 171 yawma
87 68 19 x8:16 16 yawma^’i&i~
88 69 0 y8:41 42 yawma
89 70 0 y8:41 42 yawma
90 71 0 y8:48 50 !alyawma
91 72 0 y9:3 3 yawma
92 73 0 y9:18 18 wa!lyawmi
93 74 0 y9:19 19 wa!lyawmi
94 75 0 y9:25 25 wayawma
95 76 0 y9:29 29 bi!lyawmi
96 77 0 y9:35 35 yawma
97 78 0 y9:36 36 yawma
98 79 0 y9:44 44 wa!lyawmi
99 80 0 y9:45 45 wa!lyawmi
100 81 0 y9:77 78 yawmi
101 82 0 y9:99 100 wa!lyawmi
102 83 0 y9:108 109 yawmi~
103 83 20 x10:3 3 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
104 84 0 y10:15 16 yawmi~
105 85 0 y10:28 29 wayawma
106 86 0 y10:45 46 wayawma
107 87 0 y10:60 61 yawma
108 88 0 y10:92 92 fa!lyawma
109 89 0 y10:93 93 yawma
110 89 21 x10:102 102 -‘ayya!mi days
111 90 0 y11:3 3 yawmi~
112 90 22 x11.07 9 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
113 91 0 y11:8 11 yawma
114 92 0 y11:26 28 yawmi~
115 93 0 y11:43 45 !alyawma
116 94 0 y11:60 63 wayawma
117 94 23 x11:65 68 -‘ayya!mi~ 3 days
118 94 24 x11:66 69 yawma^’i&i~ that day
119 95 0 y11:77 79 yawmu~
120 96 0 y11:84 85 yawmi~
121 97 0 y11:98 100 yawma
122 98 0 y11:99 101 wayawma
123 99 0 y11:103 105 yawmu~
124 100 0 y11:103 105 yawmu~
125 101 0 y11:105 107 yawma
126 102 0 y12:54 54 !alyawma
127 103 0 y12:92 92 !alyawma
128 103 25 x14.05 5 bi-‘ayya!mi days
129 104 0 y14:18 21 yawmi~
130 105 0 y14:31 36 yawmu~
131 106 0 y14:41 42 yawma
132 107 0 y14:42 43 liyawmi~
133 108 0 y14:44 44 yawma
134 109 0 y14:48 49 yawma
135 109 26 x14:49 50 yawma^’i&i~ that day
136 110 0 y15:35 35 yawmi
137 111 0 y15:36 36 yawmi
138 112 0 y15:38 38 yawmi
139 113 0 y16:25 27 yawma
140 114 0 y16:27 29 yawma
141 115 0 y16:27 29 !alyawma
142 116 0 y16:63 65 !alyawma
143 117 0 y16:80 82 yawma
144 118 0 y16:80 82 wayawma
145 119 0 y16:84 86 wayawma
146 119 27 x16:87 89 yawma^’i&i~ that day
147 120 0 y16:89 91 wayawma
148 121 0 y16:92 94 yawma
149 122 0 y16:111 112 yawma
150 123 0 y16:124 125 yawma
151 124 0 y17:13 14 yawma
152 125 0 y17:14 15 !alyawma
153 126 0 y17:52 54 yawma
154 127 0 y17:58 60 yawmi
155 128 0 y17:62 64 yawmi
156 129 0 y17:71 73 yawma
157 130 0 y17:97 99 yawma
158 131 0 y18:19 18 yawma~!
159 132 0 y18:19 18 yawmi~ part day
160 133 0 y18:47 45 wayawma
161 134 0 y18:52 50 wayawma
162 134 28 x18:99 99 yawma^’i&i~ that day
163 134 29 18:100 100 yawma^’i&i~ that day
164 135 0 y18:105 105 yawma
165 136 0 y19:15 15 yawma
166 137 0 y19:15 15 wayawma
167 138 0 y19:15 15 wayawma
168 139 0 y19:26 27 !alyawma
169 140 0 y19:33 34 yawma
170 141 0 y19:33 34 wayawma
171 142 0 y19:33 34 wayawma
172 143 0 y19:37 38 yawmi~
173 144 0 y19:38 39 yawma
174 145 0 y19:38 39 !alyawma
175 146 0 y19:39 40 yawma
176 147 0 y19:85 88 yawma
177 148 0 y19:95 95 yawma
178 149 0 y20:59 61 yawmu
179 150 0 y20:64 67 !alyawma
180 151 0 y20:100 100 yawma
181 152 0 y20:101 101 yawma
182 153 0 y20:102 102 yawma
183 153 30 x20:102 102 yawma^’i&i~ that day
184 154 0 y20:104 104 yawma~!
185 154 31 x20:108 107 yawma^’i&i~ that day
186 154 32 x20:109 108 yawma^’i&i~ that day
187 155 0 y20:124 124 yawma
188 156 0 y20:126 126 !alyawma
189 157 0 y21:47 48 liyawmi
190 157 33 x21:103 103 yawmukum your day
191 158 0 y21:104 104 yawma
192 159 0 y22:2 2 yawma
193 160 0 y22:9 9 yawma
194 161 0 y22:17 17 yawma
195 161 34 x22:28 29 -‘ayya!mi~ days
196 162 0 y22:47 46 yawma~!
197 163 0 y22:55 54 yawmi~
198 163 35 x22:56 55 yawma^’i&i~ that day
199 164 0 y22:69 68 yawma
200 165 0 y23:16 16 yawma
201 166 0 y23:65 67 !alyawma
202 167 0 y23:100 102 yawmi
203 167 36 x23:101 103 yawma^’i&i~ that day
204 168 0 y23:111 113 !alyawma
205 169 0 y23:113 115 yawma~!
206 170 0 y23:113 115 yawmi~ part day
207 171 0 y24:2 2 wa!lyawmi
208 172 0 y24:24 24 yawma
209 172 37 x24:25 25 yawma^’i&i~ that day
210 173 0 y24:37 37 yawma~!
211 174 0 y24:64 64 wayawma
212 175 0 y25:14 15 !alyawma
213 176 0 y25:17 18 wayawma
214 177 0 y25:22 24 yawma
215 177 38 x25:22 24 yawma^’i&i~ that day
216 177 39 x25:24 26 yawma^’i&i~ that day
217 178 0 y25:25 27 wayawma
218 178 40 x25:26 28 yawma^’i&i~ that day
219 179 0 y25:26 28 yawma~!
220 180 0 y25:27 29 wayawma
221 180 41 x25:59 60 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
222 181 0 y25:69 69 yawma
223 182 0 y26:38 37 yawmi~
224 183 0 y26:82 82 yawma
225 184 0 y26:87 87 yawma
226 185 0 y26:88 88 yawma
227 186 0 y26:135 135 yawmi~
228 187 0 y26:155 155 yawmi~
229 188 0 y26:156 156 yawmi~
230 189 0 y26:189 189 yawmi
231 190 0 y26:189 189 yawmi~
232 191 0 y27:83 85 wayawma
233 192 0 y27:87 89 wayawma
234 192 42 x27:89 91 yawma^’i&i~ that day
235 193 0 y28:41 41 wayawma
236 194 0 y28:42 42 wayawma
237 195 0 y28:61 61 yawma
238 196 0 y28:62 62 wayawma
239 197 0 y28:65 65 wayawma
240 197 43 x28:66 66 yawma^’i&i~ that day
241 198 0 y28:71 71 yawmi
242 199 0 y28:72 72 yawmi
243 200 0 y28:74 74 wayawma
244 201 0 y29:13 12 yawma
245 202 0 y29:25 24 yawma
246 203 0 y29:36 35 !alyawma
247 204 0 y29:55 55 yawma
248 204 44 x30:4 3 wayawma^’i&i~ that day
249 205 0 y30:12 11 wayawma
250 206 0 y30:14 13 wayawma
251 206 45 x30:14 13 yawma^’i&i~ that day
252 207 0 y30:43 42 yawmu~
253 207 46 x30:43 42 yawma^’i&i~ that day
254 208 0 y30:55 54 wayawma
255 209 0 y30:56 56 yawmi
256 210 0 y30:56 56 yawmu
257 210 47 x30:57 57 fayawma^’i&i~ that day
258 211 0 y31:33 32 yawma~!
259 211 48 x32:4 3 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
260 212 0 y32:5 4 yawmi~
261 212 49 x32:14 14 yawmikum your day
262 213 0 y32:25 25 yawma
263 214 0 y32:29 29 yawma
264 215 0 y33:21 21 wa!lyawma
265 216 0 y33:44 43 yawma
266 217 0 y33:66 66 yawma
267 217 50 x34:18 17 wa-‘ayya!ma~! days
268 218 0 y34:30 29 yawmi~
269 219 0 y34:40 39 wayawma
270 220 0 y34:42 41 fa!lyawma
271 221 0 y35:14 15 wayawma
272 222 0 y36:54 54 fa!lyawma
273 223 0 y36:55 55 !alyawma
274 224 0 y36:59 59 !alyawma
275 225 0 y36:64 64 !alyawma
276 226 0 y36:65 65 !alyawma
277 227 0 y37:20 20 yawmu
278 228 0 y37:21 21 yawmu
279 229 0 y37:26 26 !alyawma
280 229 51 x37:33 32 yawma^’i&i~ that day
281 230 0 y37:144 144 yawmi
282 231 0 y38:16 15 yawmi
283 232 0 y38:26 25 yawma
284 233 0 y38:53 53 liyawmi
285 234 0 y38:78 79 yawmi
286 235 0 y38:79 80 yawmi
287 236 0 y38:81 82 yawmi
288 237 0 y39:13 15 yawmi~
289 238 0 y39:15 17 yawma
290 239 0 y39:24 25 yawma
291 240 0 y39:31 32 yawma
292 241 0 y39:47 48 yawma
293 242 0 y39:60 61 wayawma
294 243 0 y39:67 67 yawma
295 243 52 x39:71 71 yawmikum your day
296 243 53 x40:9 9 yawma^’i&i~ that day
297 244 0 y40:15 15 yawma
298 245 0 y40:16 16 yawmahum
299 246 0 y40:16 16 !alyawma
300 247 0 y40:17 17 !alyawma
301 248 0 y40:17 17 !alyawma
302 249 0 y40:18 18 yawma
303 250 0 y40:27 28 biyawmi
304 251 0 y40:29 30 !alyawma
305 252 0 y40:30 31 yawmi
306 253 0 y40:32 34 yawma
307 254 0 y40:33 35 yawma
308 255 0 y40:46 49 wayawma
309 256 0 y40:49 52 yawma~!
310 257 0 y40:51 54 wayawma
311 258 0 y40:52 55 yawma
312 258 54 x41:9 8 yawmayni 2 days
313 258 55 x41:10 9 -‘ayya!mi~ 4 days
314 258 56 x41:12 11 yawmayni 2 days
315 258 57 x41:16 15 -‘ayya!mi~ days
316 259 0 y41:19 18 wayawma
317 260 0 y41:40 40 yawma
318 261 0 y41:47 47 wayawma
319 262 0 y42:7 5 yawma
320 263 0 y42:45 44 yawma
321 264 0 y42:47 46 yawmu~
322 264 58 x42:47 46 yawma^’i&i~ that day
323 265 0 y43:39 38 !alyawma
324 266 0 y43:65 65 yawmi~
325 266 59 x43:67 67 yawma^’i&i~ that day
326 267 0 y43:68 68 !alyawma
327 267 60 x43:83 83 yawmahum
328 268 0 y44:10 9 yawma
329 269 0 y44:16 15 yawma
330 270 0 y44:40 40 yawma
331 271 0 y44:41 41 yawma
332 271 61 x45:14 13 -‘yya!ma days
333 271 62 x45:17 16 yawma
334 272 0 y45:27 26 wayawma
335 273 0 y45:26 25 yawmi out of seq
336 274 0 y45:27 26 yawma^’i&i~
337 275 0 y45:28 27 !alyawma
338 276 0 y45:34 33 !alyawma
339 276 63 x45:34 33 yawmikum your day
340 277 0 y45:35 34 fa!lyawma
341 278 0 y46:5 4 yawmi
342 279 0 y46:20 19 wayawma
343 279 64 x46:20 19 fa!lyawma today
344 280 0 y46:21 20 yawmi~
345 281 0 y46:34 33 wayawma
346 282 0 y46:35 34 yawma
347 283 0 y50:20 19 yawmu
348 284 0 y50:22 21 !alyawma
349 285 0 y50:30 29 yawma
350 286 0 y50:34 33 yawmu
351 286 65 x50:38 37 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
352 287 0 y50:41 40 yawma
353 288 0 y50:42 41 yawma
354 289 0 y50:42 41 yawmu F missed
355 290 0 y50:44 43 yawma
356 291 0 y51:12 12 yawmu
357 292 0 y51:13 13 yawma
358 292 66 x51:60 60 yawmihim that day of theirs
359 293 0 y52:9 9 yawma
360 293 67 x52:11 11 yawma^’i&i~ that day
361 294 0 y52:13 13 yawma
362 294 68 x52:45 45 yawmahum
363 295 0 y52:46 46 yawma
364 296 0 y54:6 6 yawma
365 297 0 Y skipped
366 298 0 y54:8 8 yawmu~ Y had 54:7
367 299 0 y54:19 19 yawmi
368 300 0 y54:48 48 yawma
369 301 0 y55:29 29 yawmi~
370 301 69 x55:39 39 fayawma^’i&i~ that day
371 302 0 y56:50 50 yawmi~
372 303 0 y56:56 56 yawma
373 303 70 x57:4 4 -‘ayya!mi~ 6 days
374 304 0 y57:12 12 yawma
375 305 0 y57:12 12 !alyawma
376 306 0 y57:13 13 yawma
377 307 0 y57:15 14 fa!lyawma
378 308 0 y58:6 7 yawma
379 309 0 y58:7 8 yawma
380 310 0 y58:18 19 yawma
381 311 0 y58:22 22 wa!lyawmi
382 312 0 y60:3 3 yawma
383 313 0 y60:6 6 wa!lyawma
384 314 0 y62:9 9 yawmi F missed
385 315 0 y64:9 9 yawmu
386 316 0 y64:9 9 liyawmi
387 317 0 y64:9 9 yawma
388 318 0 y65:2 2 wa!lyawmi
389 319 0 y66:7 7 !alyawma
390 320 0 y66:8 8 yawma
391 321 0 y68:24 24 !alyawma
392 322 0 y68:39 39 yawmi
393 323 0 y68:42 42 yawma
394 323 71 x69:7 7 -‘ayya!mi~ 8 days
395 323 72 x69:15 15 fayawma^’i&i~ that day
396 323 73 x69:16 16 yawma^’i&i~ that day
397 323 74 x69:17 17 yawma^’i&i~ that day
398 323 75 x69:18 18 yawma^’i&i~ that day
399 323 76 x69:24 24 !l-‘ayya!mi days
400 324 0 y69:35 35 !alyawma
401 325 0 y70:4 4 yawmi~
402 326 0 y70:8 8 yawma
403 326 77 x70:11 11 yawma^’i&i~ that day
404 327 0 y70:26 26 biyawmi
405 327 78 x70:42 42 yawmahum that day of theirs
406 328 0 y70:43 43 yawma
407 329 0 y70:44 44 !lyawmu
408 330 0 y73:14 14 yawma
409 331 0 y73:17 17 yawma~!
410 331 79 x74:9 9 yawma^’i&i~ that day
411 332 0 y74:9 9 yawmu~
412 333 0 y74:46 47 biyawmi
413 334 0 y75:1 1 biyawmi
414 335 0 y75:6 6 yawmu
415 335 80 x75:10 10 yawma^’i&i~ that day
416 335 81 x75:12 12 yawma^’i&i~ that day
417 335 82 x75:13 13 yawma^’i&i~ that day
418 335 83 x75:22 22 yawma^’i&i~ that day
419 335 84 x75:24 24 yawma^’i&i~ that day
420 335 85 x75:30 30 yawma^’i&i~ that day
421 336 0 y76:7 7 yawma~!
422 337 0 y76:10 10 yawma~!
423 338 0 y76:11 11 !lyawmi that day
424 339 0 y76:27 27 yawma~!
425 340 0 y77:12 12 yawmi~
426 341 0 y77:13 13 liyawmi
427 342 0 y77:14 14 yawmu
428 342 86 x77:15 15 yawma^’i&i~ that day
429 342 87 x77:19 19 yawma^’i&i~ that day
430 342 88 x77:24 24 yawma^’i&i~ that day
431 342 89 x77:28 28 yawma^’i&i~ that day
432 342 90 x77:34 34 yawma^’i&i~ that day
433 343 0 y77:35 35 yawmu
434 343 91 x77:37 37 yawma^’i&i~ that day
435 344 0 y77:38 38 yawmu
436 344 92 x77:40 40 yawma^’i&i~ that day
437 344 93 x77:45 45 yawma^’i&i~ that day
438 344 94 x77:47 47 yawma^’i&i~ that day
439 344 95 x77:49 49 yawma^’i&i~ that day
440 345 0 y78:17 17 yawma
441 346 0 y78:18 18 yawma
442 347 0 y78:38 38 yawma
443 348 0 y78:39 39 !lyawmu
444 349 0 y78:40 41 yawma
445 350 0 y79:6 6 yawma
446 350 96 x79:8 8 yawma^’i&i~ that day
447 351 0 y79:35 35 yawma
448 352 0 y79:46 46 yawma
449 353 0 y80:34 34 yawma
450 353 97 x80:37 37 yawma^’i&i~ that day
451 353 98 x80:38 38 yawma^’i&i~ that day
452 353 99 x80:40 40 yawma^’i&i~ that day
453 354 0 y82:15 15 yawma
454 355 0 y82:17 17 yawmu F missed
455 356 0 y82:18 18 yawmu
456 357 0 y82:19 19 yawma
457 357 100 x82:19 19 yawma^’i&i~ that day
458 358 0 y83:5 5 liyawmi~
459 359 0 y83:6 6 yawma
460 359 101 x83:10 10 yawma^’i&i~ that day
461 360 0 y83:11 11 biyawmi
462 360 102 x83:15 15 yawma^’i&i~ that day
463 361 0 y83:34 34 fa!lyawma
464 362 0 y85:2 2 wa!lyawmi
465 363 0 y86:9 9 yawma
466 363 103 x88:2 2 yawma^’i&i~ that day
467 363 104 x88:8 8 yawma^’i&i~ that day
468 363 105 x89:23 24 yawma^’i&i~ that day
469 363 106 x89:23 24 yawma^’i&i~ that day
470 363 107 x89:25 25 fayawma^’i&i~ that day
471 364 0 y90:14 14 yawmi~
472 364 108 x99:4 4 yawma^’i&i~ that day
473 364 109 x99:6 6 yawma^’i&i~ that day
474 364 110 x100:11 11 yawma^’i&i~ that day
475 365 0 y101:4 3 yawma
476 365 111 x102:8 8 yawma^’i&i~ that day

Notes: The total count is 476 instead of 475 because Yuksel’s unused 297 is numbered. Interestingly, this is number 365 in my list! “F missed” indicates that this mention is not found in Flugel’s concordance. One verse in Yuksel is slightly “out of sequence.” Three mentions of “day” refer to “part of a day.” Two of Yuksel’s verse numbers were incorrect or nonstandard.

Unusual transliteration symbols: ~ nunates the previous vowel ! is alif, and also hamzat-ul-wasl – is alif as a chair for hamza ‘ is hamza & is dhal ^ is a point (used with hamza).

LOMAX: Edip Yuksel wrote: “Just now I saw Lomax’ legthy answer which is trying to confuse the simple issue. I am, inshallah, going to expose his blindig prejudice, as I did before.”

It is my sincere hope that Yuksel can do what he claims. But I fear that he must first cast the beam out of his own eye before he will be able to help me with my own defects of vision.

My answer was not “lengthy,” rather it was short, in its summary, and lengthy only because the supporting data was appended. Yes, this issue is simple. How many times does the word “day” occur in the Qur’an?

The short answer is zero, because “day” is an English word. One will note that zero is divisible by both 19 and 365 without any remainder.

But, really, we are talking about an Arabic word. But what Arabic word? It turns out that this is not a simple a question as the Khalifites would pretend. If the word is “yawm” in all its forms, the answaer is 475 times, to the best of my knowledge, and I have made it easy to correct me by publishing my “lengthy” response. I actively invite and hope for correction.

Eliminating the non-singular forms, we still have 445. To get 365, it is necessary to eliminate some singular forms. An obvious candidate is yawma’idh, which means, literally, “the day when,” and ‘idh is written connected with yawm, so one may be able to claim, by the perverse logic typical of Khalifites, that this is a different word (but Khalifa translates it using the word “day”). This will only account for 70 mentions; we still have 375 left. If we eliminate all forms with pronoun suffixes, there remain 364, or, instead, we can eliminate all forms with prefixes, in which case their remain 356. I haven’t yet found a way to get 365. My guess is that either there is a missing occurrence in the list, in which case 364 becomes 365, or previous sources accidentally counted, like Yuksel, one of the yawma’idh occurrences.

Edip Yuksel wrote: “For those who wonder our previous debate with Lomax on the code 19, please download a copy of “Running Like Zebras” from: http://www.moslem.org/yuksel.htm”

I thank Yuksel for the link. . . .

As for “running like zebras,” I would rather run like a zebra, which is a honest creature meaning harm to no one, than bark like a hyena.

Edip Yuksel  wrote: “Wait Lomax. The candle of falsifiers cannot misguide people against the light of the truth.”

Satan has power only over those who follow him. Khalifa said, a false messenger is a messenger of Satan. This is the warning, as always there is a warning, like the warning of the angels at Babylon.

With the work I did, and presuming that Yuksel had actually counted the words, it should be only a few minutes to make a preliminary comment on my paper. After all, all it talked about is a word count, and the differences between my count and Yuksels’s count were thoroughly and clearly cited. I found numerous clear errors in Yuksel’s count. I hope that he or anyone else can find any remaining errors in mine.

But, true to form, Yuksel responds, not with facts, but with bluster. Instead of joining with others as seekers of truth, he blames me for “extreme skepticism.” Yuksel, repent; your repentance will open for you the gates of paradise and ward off from you humiliation in this life and the next. I do not write all this but in the hope of guidance for myself and for others, including you and other brothers and sisters who, like

Dr. Khalifa, were misled by this particular fitna.

LOMAX: Edip Yuksel  wrote: “Well, Lomax you are exposed many times of trying to confuse the issue by a wobbly extreme skepticism. Thank God it has been documented in “Running Like Zebras” for those who seek the truth.”

For me, the matter becomes more and more clear. Originally, the “numerical miracles” were presented by Dr. Khalifa as a proof that even the skeptical could examine and test. Supposedly it was “scientific” and “mathematical” proof. Now, when one of these claims is carefully examined, and the results of the investigation are published in a way that makes it easy for anyone to check the results, Yuksel can only refer to “skepticism” as if it were something hateful. This is the mark of religious fanaticism; more and more, I see his resemblance to the very religious scholars he hates. This is not surprising, that the son would resemble his father.

Edip Yuksel  wrote: “As for your recent posting on the frequency of the word “day”, wait few days for its exposition. And do not forget that God is the only master of the day of judgment. The miracle of the Quran will continue to increase the faith of believers despite of falsifiers.”

A “falsifier” is someone who changes the truth. Yuksel is the man who, with his own hand, with white-out and pen, altered the text of the Qur’an, by his own admission. He is the man who published a list, supposedly of all occurrences of the word “day” in the Qur’an, and this list was false on its face, and even more false when examined in detail. If I have erred in my publication, I invite correction, something Yuksel does not do; in fact he hates it.

My original work on the 19 contained a detailed discussion of the question of how many times the word “Allah” occurs in the Qur’an. That discussion, based on the work of Khalifa collated with the work of Phillips, and a direct examination of the Qur’an were these two sources differed, was in error as to its conclusions. The error proceeded from the fact that Phillips had not found all of Khalifa’s errors, and the errors that remained were balancing errors; the result being that the count of “Allah”, excluding the initial bismillahs, but including the first, was 2699; thus Khalifa, apparently, was correct in his later assertion that the count becomes 2698 if 9:128-129 are excluded.

(Of course, it is also 2698 in Warsh without truncating sura 9, because Warsh does not include 1:1 as a verse of the Qur’an.)

But I only was able to discover this once I obtained a copy of the Arabic/English edition of Khalifa’s translation, which gives a runninig total. With that running total, I could compare it with the earlier verse-by-verse total from Visual Presentation of the Miracle, and find the remaining discrepancies. Khalifa’s early work was full of errors.

My point is that, even though I published clearly founded and verifiable (but wrong) evidence that the count was 2701, no Khalifite pointed out where I was wrong. this is because they do not actually count these things: they are people of the very taqlid they condemn.

At one time, by his report, Yuksel actually did do quite a bit of counting. But he has settled into belief, and this 365 day question is the proof.

When I started to count, I did not know whether or not the count would be 365 days or not. I merely thought it was absurd to debate the significance of a phenomenon that had not been shown to exist.

The little boy who said that the emperor had no clothes was not a skeptic, he merely reported what he saw.

However, so many times has this particular “emperor” appeared naked inpublic, I do now expect him to be unclothed, and I am not sure that I willcontinue to spend the dozen or so hours of work that it took, in thiscase, to carefully collate the data, every time another Khalifite claimappears.

If there is a numerical miracle in the Qur’an, the Khaliftes are guilty, not of proclaiming it, but of concealing it by a confusion of false claims. I am still, from time to time, working with people who believe they have found statistically signficant phenomena; so far, no cigar, but, as Yuksel says, judgment is with Allah, and he guides to his path whom he wills.

THERE ARE 365 OCCURRENCES OF THE WORD “YWM” (DAY) IN THE QURAN

LOMAX: Of the 475 total occurrences of all forms of “yawm,” 3 are in the dual and 27 are in the plural, leaving 445 in the singular. . . .Yuksel’s counts do not add up to 365 because he skipped his number 297. To summarize the discrepancies, besides plurals, Yuksel has not counted any of the forms ending with ^-i&i~, except for one single mention at 45:27. This accounts for 69 omissions. He counted 6 mentions of fa!lyawma out of 8 (2 omissions). He also inconsistently counted simple forms of yawm with suffixed pronouns: 1 out of 4 occurrences of yawmahum were counted (3 omissions), 1 out of 2 yawmihim (1 omissions), and yawmikum and yawmukum were not counted at all (5 omissions). Finally, he missed a mention of yawma at 45:17. With the 30 duals and plurals, this accounts for the difference of 111.

I see no way to reconcile this data with the claim of 365 mentions. The sloppiness of the counting is typical of Khalifite claims; if the count works out, research and checking have a tendency to stop.

YUKSEL: Well, as you see, I did not stop. (It is another proof that I am not a Khalifite as projected by a confessed Muhammadan, Lomax). I would like to thank Lomax for his efforts. I Hope it will serve a good function to find the truth of this matter. Based on Lomax’s tedious work, I have corrected several typo errors. As for his summary of “discrepancies,” here are my answers:

I did not count the word YWM (pronounced as yawm) with suffixes. I did not need to mention this, since the word (YWM) by itself was sufficient to express this point. In my earlier posting I wrote about “the frequency of the word “yawm” day (in its singular form) in the Quran.” A non-hostile eye would easily notice that I did not mention “yawmahum” (their days), nor yawma-izin (that day), etc. In fact, the counting method we deduce from this word is used for all other computations. For instance, in the count of the word ALLAH (GOD) we did not count the ones with the suffix HUMMA. As we discussed in my book “Running Like Zebras,” (available from http://www.moslem.com [and from www.yuksel.org]) a clear, sound and consistent counting method is employed in the mathematical structure of the Quran. The confusion here is superficially created by Lomax, whose skeptical confusion reaches a crescendo when it comes to the mathematical structure of the Quran, or monotheism.

The 45:27 in my list was merely a typing error. It should have been 45:17. I also omitted one, only one count of “fa!lyawma.” Lomax confused the word I have counted in 7:51 with the one I have not. He is right regarding the second omission. I have missed the word “fa!lyawma” in 46:20. This, by the way, makes my count 365.

As I stated above, Lomax wrongly identified the word I have counted in 7:51. There, I did not count “yawmahum” (their days) as he claimed; I counted “fa!lyawma” which he wrongly accused me of its omission.

Below is my correction of the list presented by Lomax.

I have erased the notes regarding Flugel’s concordance. It is irrelevant at this point and will complicate the simple counting of the word. Thanks to Lomax, he has already managed to create a non-friendly sceen by his “unusual transliteration symbols.” Furthermore, in order to create consistency, I have translated the few words that he had forgotten to translate. I also want to remind the reader the fact that the three-letter root of the word in question is”YWM.” The vowels used in English transliterations are not original letters.

ALL MENTIONS OF ANY FORM OF “YWM” IN THE QURAN

• “YSEQ” is the number given by Yuksel to the mention, or is his number for the most recent mention.
• “XSEQ” is the number of additional mentions that Lomax found. If “xseq” is 0, the mention is found in Yuksel’s article. These numbers can be used to recover the verse order if the database has been resorted.
• “VERSE” is the standard verse number, prefixed with “y” if it is from Yuksel, and “x” if it is not in his article.
• “FORM” gives my own transliteration of the Arabic form. This is non-standard, but standard transliteration does not fully convey Arabic writing, only pronunciation, more or less. Transliteration notes are at the end.
• “TRANS ” is a rough translation of some words; also some mentions of “day” give a specific number, which is shown.

        YSEQ    XSEQ    VERSE   FORM           TRANS

1       1       0       y1:4    yawmi

2       2       0       y2:8    wabi!lyawmi

3       3       0       y2:48   yawma~!

4       4       0       y2:62   wa!lyawmi

5       4       1       x2:80   -‘ayya!ma~!    days

6       5       0       y2:85   wayawma

7       6       0       y2:113  yawma

8       7       0       y2:123  yawma~!

9       8       0       y2:126  wa!lyawmi

10      9       0       y2:174  yawma

11      10      0       y2:177  wa!lyawmi

12      10      2       x2:184  -‘ayya!ma~!    days

13      10      3       x2:184  -‘ayya!mi~     days

14      10      4       x2:185  -‘ayya!mi~     days

15      10      5       x2:196  -‘ayya!mi~     days

16      10      6       x2:203  -‘ayya!mi~     days

17      10      7       x2:203  yawmayni       (2) days

18      11      0       y2:212  yawma

19      12      0       y2:228  wa!lyawmi

20      13      0       y2:232  wa!lyawmi

21      14      0       y2:249  !alyawma

22      15      0       y2:254  yawmu~

23      16      0       y2:259  yawma~!

24      17      0       y2:259  yawmi~

25      18      0       y2:264  wa!lyawmi

26      19      0       y2:281  yawma~!

27      20      0       y3:9    liyawmi~

28      20      8       x3:24   -‘ayya!ma~!    days

29      21      0       y3:25   liyawmi~

30      22      0       y3:30   yawma

31      22      9       x3:41   -‘ayya!mi~     (3) days

32      23      0       y3:55   yawmi

33      24      0       y3:77   yawma

34      25      0       y3:106  yawma

35      26      0       y3:114  wa!lyawmi

36      26      10      x3:140  !al-‘ayya!mu   days

37      27      0       y3:155  yawma

38      28      0       y3:161  yawma

39      29      0       y3:166  yawma

40      29      11      x3:167  yawma^’i&i~    that day

41      30      0       y3:180  yawma

42      31      0       y3:185  yawma

43      32      0       y3:194  yawma

44      33      0       y4:38   bi!lyawmi

45      34      0       y4:39   wa!lyawmi

46      34      12      x4:42   yawma^’i&i~    that day

47      35      0       y4:59   wa!lyawmi

48      36      0       y4:87   yawmi

49      37      0       y4:109  yawma

50      38      0       y4:136  wa!lyawmi

51      39      0       y4:141  yawma

52      40      0       y4:159  wayawma

53      41      0       y4:162  wa!lyawmi

54      42      0       y5:3    !alyawma

55      43      0       y5:3    !alyawma

56      44      0       y5:5    !alyawma

57      45      0       y5:14   yawmi

58      46      0       y5:36   yawmi

59      47      0       y5:64   yawmi

60      48      0       y5:69   wa!lyawmi

61      48      13      x5:89   -‘ayya!mi~     (3) days

62      49      0       y5:109  yawma

63      50      0       y5:119  yawmu

64      51      0       y6:12   yawmi

65      52      0       y6:15   yawmi~

66      52      14      x6:16   yawma^’i&i~    that day

67      53      0       y6:22   wayawma

68      54      0       y6:73   wayawma

69      55      0       y6:73   yawma

70      56      0       y6:93   !alyawma

71      57      0       y6:128  wayawma

72      57      15      x6:130  yawmikum       your day

73      58      0       y6:141  yawma

74      59      0       y6:158  yawma

75      59      16      x7:8    yawma^’i&i~    that day

76      60      0       y7:14   yawmi

77      61      0       y7:32   yawma

78      62      0       y7:51   fa!lyawma

79      62      17      x7:51   yawmihim       their day

80      63      0       y7:53   yawma

81      63      18      x7:54   -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

82      64      0       y7:59   yawmi~

83      65      0       y7:163  yawma

84      66      0       y7:163  wayawma

85      67      0       y7:167  yawmi

86      68      0       y7:172  yawma

87      68      19      x8:16   yawma^’i&i~    that day

88      69      0       y8:41   yawma

89      70      0       y8:41   yawma

90      71      0       y8:48   !alyawma

91      72      0       y9:3    yawma

92      73      0       y9:18   wa!lyawmi

93      74      0       y9:19   wa!lyawmi

94      75      0       y9:25   wayawma

95      76      0       y9:29   bi!lyawmi

96      77      0       y9:35   yawma

97      78      0       y9:36   yawma

98      79      0       y9:44   wa!lyawmi

99      80      0       y9:45   wa!lyawmi

100     81      0       y9:77   yawmi

101     82      0       y9:99   wa!lyawmi

102     83      0       y9:108  yawmi~

103     83      20      x10:3   -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

104     84      0       y10:15  yawmi~

105     85      0       y10:28  wayawma

106     86      0       y10:45  wayawma

107     87      0       y10:60  yawma

108     88      0       y10:92  fa!lyawma

109     89      0       y10:93  yawma

110     89      21      x10:102 -‘ayya!mi      days

111     90      0       y11:3   yawmi~

112     90      22      x11.07  -‘ayya!mi~     days

113     91      0       y11:8   yawma

114     92      0       y11:26  yawmi~

115     93      0       y11:43  !alyawma

116     94      0       y11:60  wayawma

117     94      23      x11:65  -‘ayya!mi~     (3) days

118     94      24      x11:66  yawma^’i&i~    that day

119     95      0       y11:77  yawmu~

120     96      0       y11:84  yawmi~

121     97      0       y11:98  yawma

122     98      0       y11:99  wayawma

123     99      0       y11:103 yawmu~

124     100     0       y11:103 yawmu~

125     101     0       y11:105 yawma

126     102     0       y12:54  !alyawma

127     103     0       y12:92  !alyawma

128     103     25      x14.05  bi-‘ayya!mi    days

129     104     0       y14:18  yawmi~

130     105     0       y14:31  yawmu~

131     106     0       y14:41  yawma

132     107     0       y14:42  liyawmi~

133     108     0       y14:44  yawma

134     109     0       y14:48  yawma

135     109     26      x14:49  yawma^’i&i~    that day

136     110     0       y15:35  yawmi

137     111     0       y15:36  yawmi

138     112     0       y15:38  yawmi

139     113     0       y16:25  yawma

140     114     0       y16:27  yawma

141     115     0       y16:27  !alyawma

142     116     0       y16:63  !alyawma

143     117     0       y16:80  yawma

144     118     0       y16:80  wayawma

145     119     0       y16:84  wayawma

146     119     27      x16:87  yawma^’i&i~    that day

147     120     0       y16:89  wayawma

148     121     0       y16:92  yawma

149     122     0       y16:111 yawma

150     123     0       y16:124 yawma

151     124     0       y17:13  yawma

152     125     0       y17:14  !alyawma

153     126     0       y17:52  yawma

154     127     0       y17:58  yawmi

155     128     0       y17:62  yawmi

156     129     0       y17:71  yawma

157     130     0       y17:97  yawma

158     131     0       y18:19  yawma~!

159     132     0       y18:19  yawmi~

160     133     0       y18:47  wayawma

161     134     0       y18:52  wayawma

162     134     28      x18:99  yawma^’i&i~    that day

163     134     29      18:100  yawma^’i&i~    that day

164     135     0       y18:105 yawma

165     136     0       y19:15  yawma

166     137     0       y19:15  wayawma

167     138     0       y19:15  wayawma

168     139     0       y19:26  !alyawma

169     140     0       y19:33  yawma

170     141     0       y19:33  wayawma

171     142     0       y19:33  wayawma

172     143     0       y19:37  yawmi~

173     144     0       y19:38  yawma

174     145     0       y19:38  !alyawma

175     146     0       y19:39  40      yawma

176     147     0       y19:85  yawma

177     148     0       y19:95  yawma

178     149     0       y20:59  yawmu

179     150     0       y20:64  !alyawma

180     151     0       y20:100 yawma

181     152     0       y20:101 yawma

182     153     0       y20:102 yawma

183     153     30      x20:102 yawma^’i&i~    that day

184     154     0       y20:104 yawma~!

185     154     31      x20:108 yawma^’i&i~    that day

186     154     32      x20:109 yawma^’i&i~    that day

187     155     0       y20:124 yawma

188     156     0       y20:126 !alyawma

189     157     0       y21:47  liyawmi

190     157     33      x21:103 yawmukum       your day

191     158     0       y21:104 yawma

192     159     0       y22:2   yawma

193     160     0       y22:9   yawma

194     161     0       y22:17  yawma

195     161     34      x22:28  -‘ayya!mi~     days

196     162     0       y22:47  yawma~!

197     163     0       y22:55  yawmi~

198     163     35      x22:56  yawma^’i&i~    that day

199     164     0       y22:69  yawma

200     165     0       y23:16  yawma

201     166     0       y23:65  !alyawma

202     167     0       y23:100 yawmi

203     167     36      x23:101 yawma^’i&i~    that day

204     168     0       y23:111 !alyawma

205     169     0       y23:113 yawma~!

206     170     0       y23:113 yawmi~  part day

207     171     0       y24:2   wa!lyawmi

208     172     0       y24:24  yawma

209     172     37      x24:25  yawma^’i&i~    that day

210     173     0       y24:37  yawma~!

211     174     0       y24:64  wayawma

212     175     0       y25:14  !alyawma

213     176     0       y25:17  wayawma

214     177     0       y25:22  yawma

215     177     38      x25:22  yawma^’i&i~    that day

216     177     39      x25:24  yawma^’i&i~    that day

217     178     0       y25:25  wayawma

218     178     40      x25:26  yawma^’i&i~    that day

219     179     0       y25:26  yawma~!

220     180     0       y25:27  wayawma

221     180     41      x25:59  -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

222     181     0       y25:69  yawma

223     182     0       y26:38  yawmi~

224     183     0       y26:82  yawma

225     184     0       y26:87  yawma

226     185     0       y26:88  yawma

227     186     0       y26:135 yawmi~

228     187     0       y26:155 yawmi~

229     188     0       y26:156 yawmi~

230     189     0       y26:189 yawmi

231     190     0       y26:189 yawmi~

232     191     0       y27:83  wayawma

233     192     0       y27:87  wayawma

234     192     42      x27:89  yawma^’i&i~    that day

235     193     0       y28:41  wayawma

236     194     0       y28:42  wayawma

237     195     0       y28:61  yawma

238     196     0       y28:62  wayawma

239     197     0       y28:65  wayawma

240     197     43      x28:66  yawma^’i&i~    that day

241     198     0       y28:71  yawmi

242     199     0       y28:72  yawmi

243     200     0       y28:74  wayawma

244     201     0       y29:13  yawma

245     202     0       y29:25  yawma

246     203     0       y29:36  !alyawma

247     204     0       y29:55  yawma

248     204     44      x30:4   wayawma^’i&i~  that day

249     205     0       y30:12  wayawma

250     206     0       y30:14  wayawma

251     206     45      x30:14  yawma^’i&i~    that day

252     207     0       y30:43  yawmu~

253     207     46      x30:43  yawma^’i&i~    that day

254     208     0       y30:55  wayawma

255     209     0       y30:56  yawmi

256     210     0       y30:56  yawmu

257     210     47      x30:57  fayawma^’i&i~  that day

258     211     0       y31:33  yawma~!

259     211     48      x32:4   -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

260     212     0       y32:5   4       yawmi~

261     212     49      x32:14  yawmikum       your day

262     213     0       y32:25  yawma

263     214     0       y32:29  yawma

264     215     0       y33:21  wa!lyawma

265     216     0       y33:44  yawma

266     217     0       y33:66  yawma

267     217     50      x34:18  wa-‘ayya!ma~!  days

268     218     0       y34:30  yawmi~

269     219     0       y34:40  wayawma

270     220     0       y34:42  fa!lyawma

271     221     0       y35:14  wayawma

272     222     0       y36:54  fa!lyawma

273     223     0       y36:55  !alyawma

274     224     0       y36:59  !alyawma

275     225     0       y36:64  !alyawma

276     226     0       y36:65  !alyawma

277     227     0       y37:20  yawmu

278     228     0       y37:21  yawmu

279     229     0       y37:26  !alyawma

280     229     51      x37:33  yawma^’i&i~    that day

281     230     0       y37:144 yawmi

282     231     0       y38:16  yawmi

283     232     0       y38:26  yawma

284     233     0       y38:53  liyawmi

285     234     0       y38:78  yawmi

286     235     0       y38:79  yawmi

287     236     0       y38:81  yawmi

288     237     0       y39:13  yawmi~

289     238     0       y39:15  yawma

290     239     0       y39:24  yawma

291     240     0       y39:31  yawma

292     241     0       y39:47  yawma

293     242     0       y39:60  wayawma

294     243     0       y39:67  yawma

295     243     52      x39:71  yawmikum       your day

296     243     53      x40:9   yawma^’i&i~    that day

297     244     0       y40:15  yawma

298     245     0       y40:16  yawmahum

299     246     0       y40:16  !alyawma

300     247     0       y40:17  !alyawma

301     248     0       y40:17  !alyawma

302     249     0       y40:18  yawma

303     250     0       y40:27  biyawmi

304     251     0       y40:29  !alyawma

305     252     0       y40:30  yawmi

306     253     0       y40:32  yawma

307     254     0       y40:33  yawma

308     255     0       y40:46  wayawma

309     256     0       y40:49  yawma~!

310     257     0       y40:51  wayawma

311     258     0       y40:52  yawma

312     258     54      x41:9   yawmayni       (2) days

313     258     55      x41:10  -‘ayya!mi~     (4) days

314     258     56      x41:12  yawmayni       (2) days

315     258     57      x41:16  -‘ayya!mi~     days

316     259     0       y41:19  wayawma

317     260     0       y41:40  yawma

318     261     0       y41:47  wayawma

319     262     0       y42:7   yawma

320     263     0       y42:45  yawma

321     264     0       y42:47  yawmu~

322     264     58      x42:47  yawma^’i&i~    that day

323     265     0       y43:39  !alyawma

324     266     0       y43:65  yawmi~

325     266     59      x43:67  yawma^’i&i~    that day

326     267     0       y43:68  !alyawma

327     267     60      x43:83  yawmahum       their day

328     268     0       y44:10  yawma

329     269     0       y44:16  yawma

330     270     0       y44:40  yawma

331     271     0       y44:41  yawma

332     271     61      x45:14  -‘yya!ma       days

333     272     0       x45:17  yawma

334     273     0       y45:26  yawmi

335     274     0       y45:27  wayawma

336     274     62      x45:27  yawma^’i&i~    that day

337     275     0       y45:28  !alyawma

338     276     0       y45:34  !alyawma

339     276     63      x45:34  yawmikum       your day

340     277     0       y45:35  fa!lyawma

341     278     0       y46:5   yawmi

342     279     0       y46:20  wayawma

343     280     0       y46:20  fa!lyawma

344     281     0       y46:21  yawmi~

345     282     0       y46:34  wayawma

346     283     0       y46:35  yawma

347     284     0       y50:20  yawmu

348     285     0       y50:22  !alyawma

349     286     0       y50:30  yawma

350     287     0       y50:34  yawmu

351     287     64      x50:38  -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

352     288     0       y50:41  yawma

353     289     0       y50:42  yawma

354     290     0       y50:42  yawmu

355     291     0       y50:44  yawma

356     292     0       y51:12  yawmu

357     293     0       y51:13  yawma

358     293     66      x51:60  yawmihim       their day

359     294     0       y52:9   yawma

360     294     67      x52:11  yawma^’i&i~    that day

361     295     0       y52:13  yawma

362     295     68      x52:45  yawmahum       their day

363     296     0       y52:46  yawma

364     297     0       y54:6   yawma

365     298     0       y54:8   yawmu~

366     299     0       y54:19  yawmi

367     300     0       y54:48  yawma

368     301     0       y55:29  yawmi~

369     301     69      x55:39  fayawma^’i&i~  that day

370     302     0       y56:50  yawmi~

371     303     0       y56:56  yawma

372     303     70      x57:4   -‘ayya!mi~     (6) days

373     304     0       y57:12  yawma

374     305     0       y57:12  !alyawma

375     306     0       y57:13  yawma

376     307     0       y57:15  fa!lyawma

377     308     0       y58:6   yawma

378     309     0       y58:7   yawma

379     310     0       y58:18  yawma

380     311     0       y58:22  wa!lyawmi

381     312     0       y60:3   yawma

382     313     0       y60:6   wa!lyawma

383     314     0       y62:9   yawmi

384     315     0       y64:9   yawmu

385     316     0       y64:9   liyawmi

386     317     0       y64:9   yawma

387     318     0       y65:2   wa!lyawmi

388     319     0       y66:7   !alyawma

389     320     0       y66:8   yawma

390     321     0       y68:24  !alyawma

391     322     0       y68:39  yawmi

392     323     0       y68:42  yawma

393     323     71      x69:7   -‘ayya!mi~     (8) days

394     323     72      x69:15  fayawma^’i&i~  that day

395     323     73      x69:16  yawma^’i&i~    that day

396     323     74      x69:17  yawma^’i&i~    that day

397     323     75      x69:18  yawma^’i&i~    that day

398     323     76      x69:24  !l-‘ayya!mi    days

399     324     0       y69:35  !alyawma

400     325     0       y70:4   yawmi~

401     326     0       y70:8   yawma

402     326     77      x70:11  yawma^’i&i~    that day

403     327     0       y70:26  biyawmi

404     327     78      x70:42  yawmahum       their day

405     328     0       y70:43  yawma

406     329     0       y70:44  !lyawmu

407     330     0       y73:14  yawma

408     331     0       y73:17  yawma~!

409     331     79      x74:9   yawma^’i&i~    that day

410     332     0       y74:9   yawmu~

411     333     0       y74:46  biyawmi

412     334     0       y75:1   biyawmi

413     335     0       y75:6   yawmu

414     335     80      x75:10  yawma^’i&i~    that day

415     335     81      x75:12  yawma^’i&i~    that day

416     335     82      x75:13  yawma^’i&i~    that day

417     335     83      x75:22  yawma^’i&i~    that day

418     335     84      x75:24  yawma^’i&i~    that day

419     335     85      x75:30  yawma^’i&i~    that day

420     336     0       y76:7   yawma~!

421     337     0       y76:10  yawma~!

422     338     0       y76:11  !lyawmi

423     339     0       y76:27  yawma~!

424     340     0       y77:12  yawmi~

425     341     0       y77:13  liyawmi

426     342     0       y77:14  yawmu

427     342     86      x77:15  yawma^’i&i~    that day

428     342     87      x77:19  yawma^’i&i~    that day

429     342     88      x77:24  yawma^’i&i~    that day

430     342     89      x77:28  yawma^’i&i~    that day

431     342     90      x77:34  yawma^’i&i~    that day

432     343     0       y77:35  yawmu

433     343     91      x77:37  yawma^’i&i~    that day

434     344     0       y77:38  yawmu

435     344     92      x77:40  yawma^’i&i~    that day

436     344     93      x77:45  yawma^’i&i~    that day

437     344     94      x77:47  yawma^’i&i~    that day

438     344     95      x77:49  yawma^’i&i~    that day

439     345     0       y78:17  yawma

440     346     0       y78:18  yawma

441     347     0       y78:38  yawma

442     348     0       y78:39  !lyawmu

443     349     0       y78:40  yawma

444     350     0       y79:6   yawma

445     350     96      x79:8   yawma^’i&i~    that day

446     351     0       y79:35  yawma

447     352     0       y79:46  yawma

448     353     0       y80:34  yawma

449     353     97      x80:37  yawma^’i&i~    that day

450     353     98      x80:38  yawma^’i&i~    that day

451     353     99      x80:40  yawma^’i&i~    that day

452     354     0       y82:15  yawma

453     355     0       y82:17  yawmu

454     356     0       y82:18  yawmu

455     357     0       y82:19  yawma

456     357     100     x82:19  yawma^’i&i~    that day

457     358     0       y83:5   liyawmi~

458     359     0       y83:6   yawma

459     359     101     x83:10  yawma^’i&i~    that day

460     360     0       y83:11  biyawmi

461     360     102     x83:15  yawma^’i&i~    that day

462     361     0       y83:34  fa!lyawma

463     362     0       y85:2   wa!lyawmi

464     363     0       y86:9   yawma

465     363     103     x88:2   yawma^’i&i~    that day

466     363     104     x88:8   yawma^’i&i~    that day

467     363     105     x89:23  yawma^’i&i~    that day

468     363     106     x89:23  yawma^’i&i~    that day

469     363     107     x89:25  fayawma^’i&i~  that day

470     364     0       y90:14  yawmi~

471     364     108     x99:4   yawma^’i&i~    that day

472     364     109     x99:6   yawma^’i&i~    that day

473     364     110     x100:11 yawma^’i&i~    that day

474     365     0       y101:4  yawma

475     365     111     x102:8  yawma^’i&i~    that day

 

Unusual transliteration symbols: ~ nunates the previous vowel ! is alif, and also hamzat-ul-wasl – is alif as a chair for hamza ‘ is hamza & is dhal ^ is a point (used with hamza)

CONCLUSIONS:

I expect Lomax to reflect on this corrected table and acknowledge the following facts:

1. We both made errors in the counting.
2. After the corrections, the fact still remains intact: the frequency of the word “YWM” (in its singular form) is equal to the number of days in a solar year: 365.
3. As Lomax has acknowledged, the frequency of dual and plural forms is 30. Does it require too much imagination to see this number as indicator of average number of days in a month?
4. The total frequency of all forms of the word “YWM” as acknowledged by Lomax, is 475, that is, 19×25. (Congratulations for discovering this fact “by accident.”)

God always exposes those who rejects the truth (47:29). Here is how:

First, in our previous arguments on the code 19, Lomax always tried to come up with different ways of count that were not divisible by the code. In other words, he always escaped from that number, fulfilling the prophetic description of 74:50. However, here, God Almighty trapped him with that number. In trying to escape from 365 he resorted to 475, a number divisible by 19. Observing his 19-phobic behavior, I am sure he would have rejected the total 475 had he noticed that it was divisible by 19 or had we introduced it as an evidence for the mathematical code of the Quran.

Second, Lomax translated SOME of those forms in his list. Inadvertently, he demonstrated the truth since NONE of the forms he has translated were counted by us. If you count the frequency of UNtranslated form(s) you will have 365. Coincidence?

Also there was a divine sign for Lomax to stop and reflect. He noticed it, but did not take heed. Lomax wrote: “The total count is 476 instead of 475 because Yuksel’s unused 297 is numbered. Interestingly, this is number 365 in my list!” He does not know that God Almighty shows His signs to us even through sloppy work.

5. Fuad Abdulbaqy’s concordance is much more accurate than the concordances used by Lomax. His concordance, Flugel, (1) misses three occurrences out of 475, (2) does not follow the standard verse numbering, and (3) divides words into fictional different forms, confusing irrelevant vowels with letters. On the other hand, Abdulbaqy’s concordance, (1) misses only one occurrence out of 475 and makes the correction in its introduction. (2) follows the standard verse numbering, and (3) divides words according to a grammatically reasonable classification. Despite my previous suggestions, Lomax is still insisting on not using this most accurate and popular index.

Abdulbaqi’s concordance lists only 9 different forms of this word. Some of those forms should be combined, since the suffix “alif” does not add any extra meaning; except showing that the word is used as an object in the sentence. Therefore, we have only 6 different forms of this word mentioned in the Quran, not 34 diffirent forms as Lomax claims. Here are the different forms of “YWM” listed by “Mu’jam-ul Mufahras Lielfaz-il Quran-il Kareem,” preceded by their frequency in the Quran:

365 ……………. ywm, ……………….. day
5 ……………. ywm-kum …………. your day
5 ……………. ywm-hum …………. their day
3 ……………. ywm-ayn ………….. two days
27 ……………. ayyaam ……………. days
70 ……………. ywm-ezen ………… that day
—————————————————–
475 (19×25)
“Indeed, they have rejected this without studying and examining it, and before understanding it. Thus did those before them disbelieve. Therefore, note the consequences for the transgressors. Some of them believe, while others disbelieve in it. Your Lord is fully aware of the evildoers.” (10:39-40)

“The Hour has come closer, and the moon has split. Then they saw a miracle; but they turned away and said, “Old magic.” They disbelieved, followed their own desires, and adhered to their old traditions. Sufficient warnings have been delivered to alert them. Great wisdom; but all the warnings have been in vain.” (54:1-5).

“Disregard them until they meet THEIR DAY in which they are struck. On that DAY, their schemes will not protect them, nor will they be helped.” (52:45-46)

“Read your own record. TODAY, you suffice as your own reckoner.” (27:14)

“Then, when the horn is blown. That will be a DIFFICULT DAY. For the disbelievers, not easy.” (74:9-10).

“God will judge among you on the DAY OF RESURRECTION regarding all your disputes.” (22:69).

“You shall respond to your Lord before a DAY comes which is decreed inevitable by God. There will be no refuge for you on THAT DAY, nor an advocate.” (42:47).

 

LOMAX: Edip Yuksel wrote: “There are 365 occurrences of the word “ywm” (day) in the quran”

IF we exclude the phrase “the day when,” and forms of YWM with attached pronouns, such as “their day,” and all the dual and plural occurrences (for the phrase and the forms with attached pronouns are certainly singular), then this statement is true. It should also be noted that, to arrive at this count, one must also include all forms of “day” with prefixed prepositions and conjunctions, as well as with the suffixed alif of the indefinite accusative.

Yuksel has consistently objected to specifying such detail, but it is important: what is being done here is to determine the method of counting words which allegedly leads to the “miracle.” To discriminate words for counting purposes we need to know about these details.

Yuksel did not indentify any counting errors in my paper. There is one, described below. But I did, apparently, incorrectly assign his counts in some cases. This was due to the fact that his original article did not specify which forms were being counted: I divided the occurrences in the Qur’an into two piles: his, on the one hand, and the others which he had not mentioned. Where there were two occurrences in one verse, and one had been counted and one had not, I assigned the first to Yuksel: until I did my study I had no way of knowing which forms he was counting and which ones he was not, and, once it was relatively clear, I forgot to go back and see if I could reassign these occurrences to show a more consistent pattern.

Yuksel wrote: “I did not count the word YWM (pronounced as yawm) with suffixes. I did not need to mention this, since the word (YWM) by itself was sufficient to express this point. In my earlier posting I wrote about “the frequency of the word ‘yawm’ day (in its singular form) in the Quran.” A non-hostile eye could have easily noticed that I did not mention “yawmahum” (their days), nor yawma-izin (that day), etc.”

I am very familiar with the arguments, and I did not know what Yuksel claims I would “easily notice” if I were not hostile. Of course, he can accuse me of lying, but the hostility would be his, not mine. I have never seen any mention of these distinctions in any of the writings on this subject. It was only after studying Yuksel’s list that I even suspected that these forms were not being counted.

Quite the contrary, I would have assumed that a count of all the occurences of the singular form of the word “day” in the Qur’an would include “their day” and “your day;” after all, these are clearly singular. But we are getting closer to a description of what the rules are for counting. It would be better if these rules were disclosed at the outset; unless, of course, one’s purpose is to make the “miracle” look as impressive as possible.

Yuksel wrote: “In fact, the counting method we deduce from this word is used for all other computations. For instance, in the count of the word ALLAH (GOD) we did not count the ones with the suffix HUMMA.

Fascinating. I had not noticed this; this is the first mention of this fact I have seen anywhere. I was already aware that the count included the two orthographically distinct forms ALLAH and LILLAH, but not that it excluded the form with the suffix (which, in the original unmarked Arabic, consists of a single M appended to the end of the word, and which makes it mean “O Allah.” Thus it is used in prayers where Allah is directly addressed by name.) The H is not part of the suffix; rather it is part of the name ALLAH.

Yuksel wrote: “As we discussed in my book ‘Running Like Zebras,’ … a clear, sound and consistent counting method is employed in the mathematical structure of the Quran. The confusion here is superficially created by Lomax, whose skeptical confusion reaches a crescendo when it comes to the mathematical structure of the Quran, or monotheism.”

“Running Like Zebras” is a fairly disorganized collection of arguments. It does not describe, at least as far as I have been able to find, any “clear, sound and consistent counting method.” Yuksel is here claiming that the only confusion which exists on this subject is that which I have “created,” but why is that simple facts like the omission of “Allahumma” from the count of “Allah” are not mentioned until now? Was this omission common knowledge? Again and again, the count of Allah has been described as “the frequency of occurrence of the word “God” (Allah) in the Qur’an.” I would expect this to include “O God,” (Allahumma) unless otherwise stated.

So now I look up one of these five mentions in “The Final Testament,” the one at 3:26. Sure enough, whereas Khalifa capitalizes the occurrences of Allah (translating them as GOD), here he translates Allahumma as “our god.” But “our god” in Arabic would be “ilAhunaa”, which does occur once in the Qur’an, at 29:46. No, Allah is the personal name of the one God in Arabic, and “Allahumma” means “O God,” the one God, not merely “my God,” or “our God, or “your God,” but THE God. Or, to put it the way Allah has commanded us to put it, when speaking to the people of the Book, “Our god and your god are one GOD.”

So now we see how the meaning of the Qur’an was distorted in “Final Testament” to maintain this “miracle.” One does not find this particular distortion in the earlier translation by Khalifa, “Qur’an: The Final Scripture.”

Yuksel wrote: “The 45:27 in my list was merely a typing error. It should have been 45:17. I also omitted one, only one count of “fa!lyawma.” Lomax confused the word I have counted in 7:51 with the one I have not. He is right regarding the second omission. I have missed the word “fa!lyawma” in 46:20. This, by the way, makes my count 365.”

What Yuksel has not made plain is that my errors were in assigning his counts to specific forms of the word. Since I did not know at the outset what specific forms he was counting (in spite of his charge that only a hostile eye would not have known), I assigned the first form in a verse where there were two to his count and made the second form one that he had not counted. Then I forgot to go back and see if changing this would rectify his inconsistencies. This was my error.

Yuksel wrote: “Below is my correction of the list presented by Lomax.”

Three days later, this correction still has not appeared. Perhaps it is lost in the net somewhere. But I will correct my list, found at http://www.crl.com/~marjan. BTW, if any reader has trouble accessing that site, please let me know. I have had two reports of Netscape crashing when trying to access it (but my copy reads it fine). I have refrained from posting it here because of its length.

Yuksel wrote: “I expect Lomax to reflect on this corrected table and acknowledge the following facts: 1. We both made errors in the counting.”

I made one error in identifying the form of a count and several errors in allocating counts to Yuksel. I did not expect my work to be free of error. The error in identification, however, was not caught by Yuksel, at least not specifically. He only asserts that a total is different than what I reported, without pointing out the specific instance of the error. This was less than helpful.

Yuksel wrote: “2. After the corrections, the fact still remain intact: the frequency of the word “YWM” (in its singular form) is equal to the number of days in a solar year: 365.”

I can now say with high certainty that, if the forms with attached pronouns and with the suffix ‘idhin are excluded, it is true that there are 365 mentions. For some reason Yuksel is allergic to mentioning the exceptions; I suspect it is because it definitely dilutes the impact of the “miracle.” He also does not mention inconvenient facts, such as that there are 365.25 days, not 365 days, in the solar year. Since “part of a day” is mentioned several times in the Qur’an (these have been included in the count of YAWM), perhaps there is some way to reconcile this fractional difference.

Yuksel wrote: “3. As Lomax has acknowledged, the frequency of dual and plural forms is 30. Does it require too much imagination to see this number as indicator of average number of days in a month?”

The average number of days in a month is, more accurately, 29.53. What Yuksel is doing is showing that cross-connections can be made between bodies of data. What he has not done is to show that these cross- connections are statistically signifigant. He has not even tried, unless one counts sheer verbal bluster as trying. One measure of effort in which I will probably never surpass Yuksel is in words per argument. Just look at “Running Like Zebras.”

Yuksel wrote: “4. The total frequency of all forms of the word “YWM” as acknowledged by Lomax, is 475, that is, 19×25. (Congratulations for discovering this fact “by accident.”)”

I have elsewhere stated the obvious: one out of nineteen statistics, collected at random, will be divisible by 19. This is not a “miracle.” So the existence of 19-divisible statistics does not prove anything, unless it is shown that they occur substantially more often than one out of nineteen examinations. Of course, if one may manipulate counting criteria, one may make it appear that they occur much more often. This is why it is so important that the criteria for counting be clearly and specifically stated in a way that they cannot be manipulated.

By selecting such criteria, knowing the effects in advance, one may make it appear that 19-divisible statistics are more common than one would expect by chance, but there is a limit to this effect. Essentially, if one has selected the criteria to make a certain group of counts come out 19-divisible, assuming that the original data is random and not ordered by 19-divisibility, this selection should not increase the occurrence of 19-divisibility in new counts done after the selection.

But if the selection criteria can be nudged each time, because of the unique character of each word, for example, there is no limit to the number of “miraculous” statistics that could be created with diligent labor.

Yuksel wrote: “God always exposes those who rejects the truth (47:29). Here is how: In our previous arguments on the code 19, Lomax always tried to come up with different ways of count that were not divisible by the code.”

What I have done is not to deny legitimate counts, but to show that there are alternate ways of counting. With a real “mathematical code,” this will not deny a legitimate decoding; it only bears on the question of whether or not the counting may have been manipulated to produce the announced result.

Yuksel wrote: “In other words, he always escaped from that number, fulfilling the prophetic description of 74:50. However, here, God Almighty trapped him with that number. In trying to escape from 365 he resorted to 475, a number divisible by 19. Observing his 19-phobic behavior, I am sure he would have rejected the total 475 had he noticed that it was divisible by 19 or had we introduced it as an evidence for the mathematical code of the Quran.”

I have never denied that there are many nineteen-divisible counts in the Qur’an. Yuksel has simply lost his mind in his polemic.

Yuksel wrote: “Second, Lomax translated SOME of those forms in his list. Inadvertently, he demonstrated the truth since NONE of the forms he has translated were counted by us. If you count the frequency of UNtranslated form(s) you will have 365. Coincidence?”

Not at all. I only translated forms which were apparently not included in Yuksel’s list. Had Yuksel’s list, proposed as proof, been correct, there would have been no problem, except for one word, which I still promise I will get to.

Yuksel wrote: “Also there was a divine sign for Lomax to stop and reflect. He noticed it, but did not take heed: “The total count is 476 instead of 475 because Yuksel’s unused 297 is numbered. Interestingly, this is number 365 in my list!” He does not know that God Almighty shows His signs to us even through sloppy work.”

But I did notice it, and commented on it. This number is an artifact of my work, combined with Yuksel’s work. We might choose to consider that as a sign that Allah is guiding our work. I have no problem with that; certainly I ask him for that. But we might also choose to consider it a sign that statistics like this turn up in collections of numbers of all kinds, not just in Qur’an, and I am certain that this is true, and Allah has power over all things.

Yuksel wrote: “5. Fuad Abdulbaqy’s concordance is much more accurate than the concordances used by Lomax. His concordance, Flugel, (1) misses three occurrences out of 475, (2) does not follow the standard verse numbering, and (3) divides words into fictional different forms, confusing irrelevant vowels with letters. On the other hand, Abdulbaqy’s concordance, (1) misses only one occurrence out of 475 and makes the correction in its introduction. (2) follows the standard verse numbering, and (3) divides words according to a grammatically reasonable classification. Despite my previous suggestions, Lomax is still insisting on not using this most accurate and popular index.”

I am flabbergasted that Yuksel somehow tries to turn the fact that I discovered three errors in Flugel (and now one more) into some kind of defect on my part. No errors were discovered in Kassis. I have only one reason for not using AbdulBaqi: I do not have a copy. I have ordered one.

Since Yuksel has now asserted that Abdulbaqy “divides words according to a grammatically reasonable classification,” will he now accept AbdulBaqi’s classifications as legitimate for a preliminary investigation of word frequencies in the Qur’an? In other words, if AbdulBaqi lists two forms separately, we will not combine them, and if he combines them, we will not separate them?

This does not mean that, if word frequencies in AbdulBaqi turn out to show a clear pattern in the Qur’an, we might not then look for ways in which AbdulBaqi’s classifications might be adjusted, but only that we will not deviate from these classifications *before* we have shown such a pattern. Without *some* clear method of identifying words, it will remain possible that the “miraculous” counts are merely an artifact of the counting process.

Yuksel wrote: “Abdulbaqi’s concordance lists only 9 different forms of this word. Some of those forms should be combined, since the suffix “alif” does not add any extra meaning; except showing that the word is used as an object in the sentence. Therefore, we have only 6 different forms of this word mentioned in the Quran, not 34 diffirent forms as Lomax claims.”

That one classification is legitimate does not deny that other classifications are legitimate. In this discussion, an excess of information is necessary at the beginning; it appears that Yuksel would like to cover up the various differences. I did not claim that it was illegitimate to combine the alif-suffixed forms, for example, nor that there was anything wrong with combining the genetive with nominative and accusative forms. In fact, my piece was primarily investigational: to determine exactly what was being counted, in the absence of clear statements from Yuksel and other claimants. However, note the slipperiness of what Yuksel is saying: AbdulBaqi lists the alif-suffixed forms separately, but we will combine them because it “does not add any meaning;” i.e., the alif only indicates how the word is being used in the sentence (which often does add meaning), but does not make a variation in the meaning of the noun itself. But this could also be asserted about “yawmikum,” etc., (that it is “your” day does not make it other than a “day”) and it is even more true about “ALLHM”; for the M does not change the meaning of ALLH, any more than prefixing a YA to the sacred name changes its meaning (both forms would mean “O God!”).

It is no wonder that the rules for counting words have not been stated. Yuksel, I suspect, knows that if he states clear rules, there will still be this exception and that exception.

Yuksel wrote: “Here are the different forms of “YWM” listed by “Mu’jam-ul Mufahras Lielfaz-il Quran-il Kareem,” preceded by their frequency in the Quran:

365 ywm day
5 ywm-kum your day
5 ywm-hum their day
3 ywm-ayn two days
27 ayyaam days
70 ywm-ezen that day
———————————
475 (19×25)”

It appears that this summary is accurate (except for a minor detail: the count for “ywm-hum” includes “ywm-him”). It matches my corrected database derived from Kassis and Flugel. Note that the occurrences of words do include all the forms with prefixes, but not those with suffixes other than alif. But, looking at this summary, I was able to find one more error in Flugel that I did not discover previously.

Flugel counts 40:16 as an occurrence of yawmahum. However, the “hum” is not attached to “yawm.” Instead, it is a separate pronoun. With the correction implied by this, my counts match the AbdulBaqi counts. Note that Yuksel did not catch this error, though he did assert, correctly, that I had missed a count (actually, the count was not missed, but rather misidentified). He did not specify the misidentified count, though the whole point of my publication of the detailed list and the summary totals by form was to make it easier to find discrepancies like this. It appears that Yuksel reasons from conclusions, not from primary evidence. The current database may be found at http://www.crl.com/~marjan, as 365day.doc.

Yuksel wrote: “Indeed, they have rejected this without studying and examining it, and before understanding it. Thus did those before them disbelieve.”

I have probably studied and examined the “miracle of the nineteen” more closely than nearly every supporter or critic of it. Yuksel may be an exception, and I think there are a few others. As to “understanding,” Allah knows best who is best in understanding. I continue to examine the claims of numerical coherency in the Qur’an. That the boy cried “wolf” falsely so many times does not prove that there is no wolf, only that the boy is not to be trusted.

YUKSEL: Yes Lomax, the answer was attached. Thank you.

I was expecting an acknowledgement of the fact that the singular form of the word “ywm” (day), (without suffixes) occurs in the Quran 365 times, its plural forms “yawmayn” and “ayyaam” occur 30 times, and all the forms of the word occur 475 (19×25) times. However, you chose not to acknowledge this simple fact.

LOMAX: The day you learn to be fully accurate in what you say, that day will I acknowledge what you say as true without reservation. You still have not quite done it.

I will say what I can say. If it is not enough for you, well, may Allah inform us as to the truth.

The word “ywm” in all its forms occurs in the Qur’an, according to my research, 475 times. This is equal to 19×25, for those who consider such correspondences significant.

The dual and plural forms together occur 30 times.

If one excludes forms with any suffix other than the alif of the accusative, and the dual and plural forms, there remain 365 occurrences.

All these facts are either explicitly stated in my corrected paper or are easily derived from it.

Now, you have repeatedly stated that there is a clear and concise method for counting words in the Qur’an.

(1) What is this method? Can you state it in a way such that it can be applied to any word, without knowing in advance what the word is? Can it be stated so clearly that a computer algorithm could be used to count words?

(2) With the word “Yawm,” all forms together occur an exact multiple of 19 times. This seems to be significant to you. If we count a series of words like “yawm” in the Qur’an, do you expect that the totals for all forms of the words (let us restrict ourselves to nouns, for simplicity) will be divisible by 19 more than would be expected from random variation?

We already know that this is not true for “Allah.” In this case, in the received text, there are 2816 occurrences. It is necessary to exclude the bismillahs other than 1:1, and 9:128, and the five “Allahumma” mentions, to come up with a multiple of 19.

“Allahumma” is clearly a form of “Allah,” even more than is “Lillah.”

This whole matter exposes only how slippery are word definitions and how you have been less than open about discussing all this. In all our discussion, knowing how important was the issue of how to count words, the exclusion of “Allahumma” was never mentioned. It was never mentioned in any publication of Khalifa, as far as I am aware. Khalifa has even distorted his translation of “Allahumma” to make it appear that it does not contain the word “Allah”!

Yuksel, you know the Qur’an well enough to know what is the fate of those who know the truth and who conceal it. But then there is an exception: “illa ladhiyna taabuw wa aslahuw wa bayyanuw.” (2:160). It is enough for me that I have reminded you of this.

You are like the magicians of Pharaoh; and you object to anyone who shines light on your ropes and hidden wires. But there remains time for you to come forward and declare the truth, though it grows short.

I fully understand how difficult this would be for you. Yet the reward from Allah would be tremendous.

Yuksel, you are intelligent enough to know that there are methods for objectively weighing the significance of “coincidences.” It would be enough, I think, if you would fully cooperate with applying these techniques to the study of the “miracle.” They are statistical techniques, and their results are thus not fully certain, but they are far more reliable than an ad hoc “Gee whiz, that’s amazing,” and, with a large enough sample, statistical results can be *very* reliable.

[YUKSEL: Years after this internet debate, I noticed that some other people are also raising the question about ALLAHUMMA (translated as ‘our Lord’), which occurs 5 times in the Quran. They ask why this word is not included in the count of ALLAH (God), which is 2698 (19×142). Those who know basics of Arabic grammar will know the reason easily. Those who do not have this knowledge can learn the difference by  checking the context of the usage of ALLAHUMMA and ALLAH. Here are few clues for those who do not know Arabic:

1. “UMMA” is not  really a suffix. There is no such a suffix in Arabic. ALLAHUMMA is an abbrevated statement usually translated “o my/our Lord.”
2. ALLAHUMMA differs from ALLAH since it cannot be the subject in a statement. Therefore, you cannot replace ALLAHUMMA in the statements where ALLAH is the subject. For instance, “ALLAH created the universe.” In Arabic you cannot say “ALLAHUMMA created the universe.” Thus, the word ALLAHUMMA is not the same as ALLAH.
3. ALLAHUMMA is also different than all other attributes of God, and it may not be considered an attribute at all. For instance you can say “ALLAH is Merciful,” but you cannot say “ALLAH is ALLAHUMMA.”
4. ALLAHUMMA, though it contains the word ALLAH, yet it is a different word. For instance, though the attributes HAKAM (Judge)  and HAKYM (Wise) contain the root letters HKM, yet they are in different forms and have different meanings. Thus each is counted seperately. Another example is RAHMAN (Gracious) and RAHYM (Merciful). Though both contain the root letters RHM, yet they are in different forms and thus they are counted seperately.]

 

Shawki HAMDAN: He also told you that if you follow him you would be wrong. He told you that unless you verify his statements, you do not have to believe him. Have you done that Hyder ? All I hear you saying is that some anonymous person improved your awareness. Who is this person ? Maybe I can improve his awareness.

The proof of the falsehood of these verses can be verified by anyone, even you !

Farid ud-Dien RICE: To what extent have you verified it, Shawki? Br. Abdurrahman Lomax was himself once a follower of Khalifa, and even knew him personally. Br. Lomax tried to verify things for himself, and then found many mistakes in Khalifa’s counts. He has even posted himself here the fallacy in the number of counts of the word “Day” in the Qur’an (which the Khalifites claim to be 365, if I remember right), posting every occurrence of the word “Day” which he found. It did not turn out to be the number the Khalifites claim it is. Have you checked things to the same extent Br. Lomax has?

FINALLY

YUKSEL: Farid ud-Dien Rice who was relying on Lomax did not know that Lomax in the end of our argument corrected his errors. Rice and other sectarian folks, while accusing others not having checked things extensively, followed our argument blindly. I did not answer Lomax’s lengthy reply, since in his last reply he finally accepted the truth without hiding it under his usual elegant and verbose rhetoric, but only with little nagging. I do not want to dwell on his misguided and erroneous new allegations. Lomax and his ditto-heads have been exposed sufficiently in our Internet argument titled “Running Like Zebras.”

Indeed, the truth of the matter depends neither on me nor on Lomax. It is an objective fact that can easily be verified or falsified by others. I thank to Lomax for allowing us to demonstrate one of the mathematical patterns of the Quran for those who do not accept claims without verification (17:36). Below is the complete list of the frequency of the singular word “DAY” (YaWM) in the Quran:

No —–> Sura:Verse 
1 ——> 1 :4
2 ——> 2:8
3 ——> 2:48
4 ——> 2:62
5 ——> 2:85
6 ——> 2:113
7 ——> 2:123
8 ——> 2:126
9 ——> 2:174
10 ——> 2:177
11 ——> 2:212
12 ——> 2:228
13 ——> 2:232
14 ——> 2:249
15 ——> 2:254
16 ——> 2:259
17 ——> 2:259
18 ——> 2:264
19 ——> 2:281
20 ——> 3:9
21 ——> 3:25
22 ——> 3:30
23 ——> 3:55
24 ——> 3:77
25 ——> 3:106
26 ——> 3:114
27 ——> 3:155
28 ——> 3:161
29 ——> 3:166
30 ——> 3:180
31 ——> 3:185
32 ——> 3:194
33 ——> 4:38
34 ——> 4:39
35 ——> 4:59
36 ——> 4:87
37 ——> 4:109
38 ——> 4:136
39 ——> 4:141
40 ——> 4:159
41 ——> 4:162
42 ——> 5:3
43 ——> 5:3
44 ——> 5:5
45 ——> 5:14
46 ——> 5:36
47 ——> 5:64
48 ——> 5:69
49 ——> 5:109
50 ——> 5:119
51 ——> 6:12
52 ——> 6:15
53 ——> 6:22
54 ——> 6:73
55 ——> 6:73
56 ——> 6:93
57 ——> 6:128
58 ——> 6:141
59 ——> 6:158
60 ——> 7:14
61 ——> 7:32
62 ——> 7:51
63 ——> 7:53
64 ——> 7:59
65 ——> 7:163
66 ——> 7:163
67 ——> 7:167
68 ——> 7:172
69 ——> 8:41
70 ——> 8:41
71 ——> 8:48
72 ——> 9:3
73 ——> 9:18
74 ——> 9:19
75 ——> 9:25
76 ——> 9:29
77 ——> 9:35
78 ——> 9:36
79 ——> 9:44
80 ——> 9:45
81 ——> 9:77
82 ——> 9:99
83 ——> 9:108
84 ——> 10:15
85 ——> 10:28
86 ——> 10:45
87 ——> 10:60
88 ——> 10:92
89 ——> 10:93
90 ——> 11:3
91 ——> 11:8
92 ——> 11:26
93 ——> 11:43
94 ——> 11:60
95 ——> 11:77
96 ——> 11:84
97 ——> 11:98
98 ——> 11:99
99 ——> 11:103
100 ——> 11:103
101 ——> 11:105
102 ——> 12:54
103 ——> 12:92
104 ——> 14:18
105 ——> 14:31
106 ——> 14:41
107 ——> 14:42
108 ——> 14:44
109 ——> 14:48
110 ——> 15:35
111 ——> 15:36
112 ——> 15:38
113 ——> 16:25
114 ——> 16:27
115 ——> 16:27
116 ——> 16:63
117 ——> 16:80
118 ——> 16:80
119 ——> 16:84
120 ——> 16:89
121 ——> 16:92
122 ——> 16:111
123 ——> 16:124
124 ——> 17:13
125 ——> 17:14
126 ——> 17:52
127 ——> 17:58
128 ——> 17:62
129 ——> 17:71
130 ——> 17:97
131 ——> 18:19
132 ——> 18:19
133 ——> 18:47
134 ——> 18:52
135 ——> 18:105
136 ——> 19:15
137 ——> 19:15
138 ——> 19:15
139 ——> 19:26
140 ——> 19:33
141 ——> 19:33
142 ——> 19:33
143 ——> 19:37
144 ——> 19:38
145 ——> 19:38
146 ——> 19:39
147 ——> 19:85
148 ——> 19:95
149 ——> 20:59
150 ——> 20:64
151 ——> 20:100
152 ——> 20:101
153 ——> 20:102
154 ——> 20:104
155 ——> 20:124
156 ——> 20:126
157 ——> 21:47
158 ——> 21:104
159 ——> 22:2
160 ——> 22:9
161 ——> 22:17
162 ——> 22:47
163 ——> 22:55
164 ——> 22:69
165 ——> 23:16
166 ——> 23:65
167 ——> 23:100
168 ——> 23:111
169 ——> 23:113
170 ——> 23:113
171 ——> 24:2
172 ——> 24:24
173 ——> 24:37
174 ——> 24:64
175 ——> 25:14
176 ——> 25:17
177 ——> 25:22
178 ——> 25:25
179 ——> 25:26
180 ——> 25:27
181 ——> 25:69
182 ——> 26:38
183 ——> 26:82
184 ——> 26:87
185 ——> 26:88
186 ——> 26:135
187 ——> 26:155
188 ——> 26:156
189 ——> 26:189
190 ——> 26:189
191 ——> 27:83
192 ——> 27:87
193 ——> 28:41
194 ——> 28:42
195 ——> 28:61
196 ——> 28:62
197 ——> 28:65
198 ——> 28:71
199 ——> 28:72
200 ——> 28:74
201 ——> 29:13
202 ——> 29:25
203 ——> 29:36
204 ——> 29:55
205 ——> 30:12
206 ——> 30:14
207 ——> 30:43
208 ——> 30:55
209 ——> 30:56
210 ——> 30:56
211 ——> 31:33
212 ——> 32:5
213 ——> 32:25
214 ——> 32:29
215 ——> 33:21
216 ——> 33:44
217 ——> 33:66
218 ——> 34:30
219 ——> 34:40
220 ——> 34:42
221 ——> 35:14
222 ——> 36:54
223 ——> 36:55
224 ——> 36:59
225 ——> 36:64
226 ——> 36:65
227 ——> 37:20
228 ——> 37:21
229 ——> 37:26
230 ——> 37:144
231 ——> 38:16
232 ——> 38:26
233 ——> 38:53
234 ——> 38:78
235 ——> 38:79
236 ——> 38:81
237 ——> 39:13
238 ——> 39:15
239 ——> 39:24
240 ——> 39:31
241 ——> 39:47
242 ——> 39:60
243 ——> 39:67
244 ——> 40:15
245 ——> 40:16
246 ——> 40:16
247 ——> 40:17
248 ——> 40:17
249 ——> 40:18
250 ——> 40:27
251 ——> 40:29
252 ——> 40:30
253 ——> 40:32
254 ——> 40:33
255 ——> 40:46
256 ——> 40:49
257 ——> 40:51
258 ——> 40:52
259 ——> 41:19
260 ——> 41:40
261 ——> 41:47
262 ——> 42:7
263 ——> 42:45
264 ——> 42:47
265 ——> 43:39
266 ——> 43:65
267 ——> 43:68
268 ——> 44:10
269 ——> 44:16
270 ——> 44:40
271 ——> 44:41
272 ——> 45:17
273 ——> 45:26
274 ——> 45:27
275 ——> 45:28
276 ——> 45:34
277 ——> 45:35
278 ——> 46:5
279 ——> 46:20
280 ——> 46:20
281 ——> 46:21
282 ——> 46:34
283 ——> 46:35
284 ——> 50:20
285 ——> 50:22
286 ——> 50:30
287 ——> 50:34
288 ——> 50:41
289 ——> 50:42
290 ——> 50:42
291 ——> 50:44
292 ——> 51:12
293 ——> 51:13
294 ——> 52:9
295 ——> 52:13
296 ——> 52:46
297 ——> 54:6
298 ——> 54:8
299 ——> 54:19
300 ——> 54:48
301 ——> 55:29
302 ——> 56:50
303 ——> 56:56
304 ——> 57:12
305 ——> 57:12
306 ——> 57:13
307 ——> 57:15
308 ——> 58:6
309 ——> 58:7
310 ——> 58:18
311 ——> 58:22
312 ——> 60:3
313 ——> 60:6
314 ——> 62:9
315 ——> 64:9
316 ——> 64:9
317 ——> 64:9
318 ——> 65:2
319 ——> 66:7
320 ——> 66:8
321 ——> 68:24
322 ——> 68:39
323 ——> 68:42
324 ——> 69:35
325 ——> 70:4
326 ——> 70:8
327 ——> 70:26
328 ——> 70:43
329 ——> 70:44
330 ——> 73:14
331 ——> 73:17
332 ——> 74:9
333 ——> 74:46
334 ——> 75:1
335 ——> 75:6
336 ——> 76:7
337 ——> 76:10
338 ——> 76:11
339 ——> 76:27
340 ——> 77:12
341 ——> 77:13
342 ——> 77:14
343 ——> 77:35
344 ——> 77:38
345 ——> 78:17
346 ——> 78:18
347 ——> 78:38
348 ——> 78:39
349 ——> 78:40
350 ——> 79:6
351 ——> 79:35
352 ——> 79:46
353 ——> 80:34
354 ——> 82:15
355 ——> 82:17
356 ——> 82:18
357 ——> 82:19
358 ——> 83:5
359 ——> 83:6
360 ——> 83:11
361 ——> 83:34
362 ——> 85:2
363 ——> 86:9
364 ——> 90:14
365 ——> 101:4

Below is the complete list of the frequency of the plural forms of the word “DAY” (AYyAM, YaWMaYN):

No —–> Sura:Verse
1 ——> 2:80
2 ——> 2:184
3 ——> 2:184
4 ——> 2:185
5 ——> 2:196
6 ——> 2:203
7 ——> 2:203
8 ——> 3:24
9 ——> 3:41
10 ——> 3:140
11 ——> 5:89
12 ——> 7:54
13 ——> 10:3
14 ——> 10:102
15 ——> 11:7
16 ——> 11:65
17 ——> 14:5
18 ——> 22:28
19 ——> 25:59
20 ——> 32:4
21 ——> 34:18
22 ——> 41:9
23 ——> 41:10
24 ——> 41:12
25 ——> 41:16
26 ——> 45:14
27 ——> 50:38
28 ——> 57:4
29 ——> 69:7
30 ——> 69:24

Below is the complete list of the frequency of the word “SHaHR” (Month):

No —–> Sura:Verse
1 ——> 2:185
2 ——> 2:185
3 ——> 2:194
4 ——> 2:194
5 ——> 2:217
6 ——> 5:2
7 ——> 5:97
8 ——> 9:36
9 ——> 34:12
10 ——> 34:12
11 ——> 46:15
12 ——> 97:3

That’s the END of the debate on 365 days and plus, finally!